Hombre3000
Hombre3000
Hombre3000

With you 100%.

This is funny because I'm about to lower my 2-door Golf. I'm not trying to scrape or anything, it just feels unstable in twisties and I'd rather have it ride a little lower than go crazy with sway bars and induce traction loss. I'm hoping a 40mm drop won't be too much but we'll see.

Just imagine the feeling of drifting a 46-liter beast that weighs 3 elephants on bike tires, with fire spitting out of the motor . . . hell of a lot more fun than this programming class.

Yep, still looks new.

Yep, these still look pretty fresh.

Admittedly, the styling updates have had a pretty big effect, but the overall design was pretty futuristic for so long ago! Definitely agree.

You beat me to it, definitely a timeless design.

I'm with you there. Still looks fantastic.

The Mk1 and Mk2 have both aged quite well. Admittedly, I am biased as a Mk2 owner.

So so so so so beautiful.

I always thought that was an excellently-styled car, and knew someone who was very happy with his. They just seem well sorted all around.

I have fallen in love with the current B7. Such a beautiful, stately design.

Yes, quite.

Tell me you're kidding! I hate those, always have. I don't mean to offend you, I'm just surprised.

Hot damn! I'll take it!

I'd finish first.

Always a balance of power, reliability, and idle/comfort/smoothness.

Thanks for posting that. It does not, however, convince me that a left lane in California is for passing only. It just says that slow drivers need to move over.

I could phrase it differently: the pedestrian is breaking the law, but the driver is required to stop.

I absolutely understand yielding to faster cars and not passing on the right, but I don't understand why cars shouldn't be able to drive in the left lane if they're not blocking anybody. Most of the time on highways, in my experience, each lane has its own speed and this sort of thing isn't a problem. What I mean to