100 games of each would be 60 hours just for testing purposes, seems a bit much.

oh good, these cheap clickbait posts always lead to rational discussions in the comment section of both games, and not troll fests at all!

Ok, i'll give them that the amount "doesn't rise to dealing"

If it was late, it clean.

I never brought Pouncy's doucheness into question. Personally i have no problem with the jersey (weren't they friends at UF too? if so i have really no problem keeping his friends jersey up in his home.)

Good thing the internet isn't a Court room, otherwise we'd have ourselves a real dilemma. Luckily it isn't, so we can just assume he's guilty, not being Jury members and all.

1) assumes good or any team communication beyond pinging the dragon for help. This study was focused on just randoms / low ranked (I assumed anyway). I agree that if a team actually communicates, they can overcome the advantage via the methods you mentioned.

right but unorganized teams don't do that. They do with the flow and barely talk. I feel like (maybe I'm wrong) this study was trying to account for the difference in non-premades.

well yea, so can team communication, but you sound like you play enough to know just like I do that team communication sucks in random/ low que.

The reason for this in non-team games with good communication/voice is simple, and i thought already pretty well known.

draft is 150 points and the daily quests easily give you 80-100 points. If you do even marginally well in draft (read: 3 wins) you get a pack and 33% of your entry fee back.

I've gotten two legendary and have yet to spend anything.

Got a boob job. also coke.

The letter also states that "The total discrepancy was increased and compounded due to human error"

I have a strong suspicion you don't know what the term "sarcasm" means

you can absolutely be forced to sell private property in america if you signed a contract saying you would. The NBA is not the government, so due process doesn't apply.

Except you can craft all but the rares, so no.

His last 35 games and inability to advance to a cup final says otherwise.

Except when he comes up against actual defense in the playoffs. The difference is those other guys find a way to keep producing once they go up against top competition for 7 games. Sid never does.

You don't think Ferance would be better than the trash they rolled out as their third pairing? No one was suggesting he was a top 4 guy. I said "for depth"