how are you this dense?

Do you know how symbols and signs work? Is the basic function of language beyond your grasp? raising an arm to hail a cab and raising an srm at a neo-nazi rally signify completely different things, even if the motion is exactly the same. Doesnt matter if it started as a ytoll, if racists start using “ok” to signal…

 it’s politics all the way down. Whether the toilet seat is up or down is political. Don’t make it political = I dont want it to be up for debate.

Lickitung’s produce salvia?  This could have some interesting applications...

Yes I’m sure a 5'8" maintenance worker just casually decided to assault a family of 4.

So is Barr intentionally channeling success kid? 

The number of people implying they still respected the office of the president through the second invasion of Iraq is a little disturbing.

How could you have been ecstatic to meet George W. Bush? Is Iraq really that distant in our memories?

i doubt he’s either.  It’s a bit.

There are such platforms... People dont use them for gaming but i’m sure they wouldnt care what you’re doing if you have a paying audience

> intentionally mismarked

I mean, she already didn’t get what she wanted. Isn’t that punishment enough?

Because “paying someone for special treatment” might be improper, déclassé, or unethical, but surely it isn’t *criminal*. Just an investment gone bad, can’t we just call the half a mil a loss and go on with life?

i mean is it really any harder to understand than home shopping network, rikki lake, court tv, the real world, the price is right, better home and garden tv?

I’ve long been of the opinion that if your elections can’t survive (ex)criminals/felons turning up to vote you have bigger problems than their influence in an election.

Why reaffirm power and authority when we all know it isn’t up for grabs? Microgamer knows perfectly well “we” can’t all just “take” the money and give it to someone else. We all know “we” aren’t in a position to “let” anyone do anything. It’s like bringing up Freeze Peach and right of the author when someone says “hey…

I’m seriously suggesting that the property rights of the well off are not natural, necessary, inviolable, or otherwise automatically worthy of respect. And that it is pernicious to think social charity and generosity should be directed by private whimsy.

I dont enjoy implying trump doesn’t get pleasure out of the suffering of others, and that such considerations are not relevant to him. That gives him too much (or maybe too little?) credit.

“everything to do with the value of collective human heritage.”

“Or maybe we can let private donors choose what they want to donate to? Just a thought. You might not agree with their reasons, but regardless of how you feel, it’s their money and therefore their choice.”