This ad from Thailand does a far better job.

I don't know about the later game phase, but so far I had no problems to afford whatever I wanted. Neither coins nor pearls are too rare. All you have to consider is to let those team members do the final killing blow who need pearls the most, done.

True, but I didn't buy Starhawk because I can't handle these things - it killed my interest into Starhawk that most team members in the beta failed to handle the game properly.

No, it isn't really a pet system. You can find pets, but they are simply "consumable" permanent boosts. A baby turtle gives +1 to the defense for example. You can find, mix and use plenty of them. I didn't register any limitations so far, besides that you have to find those pets first.

I bought it some days ago. Didn't get that far, just level 7 or 8 with 2 characters on board. I had some few interesting combats so far, but nothing that would overwhelm you in the tactical aspect. But I expect more to follow when more characters and skills are unlocked.

You ruined his rant. You bad, bad ... girl?

That is if they don't forget about it, right? :-P

It wasn't directly a Santa Monica project. Lightbox Interactive is the developer, but they did it in cooperation with Santa Monica.

Well there are some differences. Armageddon completly abandoned the series open world roots and it got even worse reviews. And Volition isn't really in the same weight class Sony's Santa Monica studio. So it wasn't such an huge surprise in RF's case.

Thumbs up about your general reflection on Starhawk, I agree with pretty much everything. Though it doesn't surprise me that they didn't add that much on top of the beta's content.

Yeah, the beta also ruined it for me. It is already too much for most players to co-operate in normal (tactical) FPS. But Starhawk easily outclassed the disappointing experiences, due the base building factor.

But that differs from you original statement. You asked who'd be the umbrella to protect privacy. My answer is that Google could easily cover that. And even if Google isn't directly involved, it is easy to share the knowledge required for Android/Linux marketplaces.

The idea of an open system only relates to allowing the user to handle the system however it pleases him and to leave anyone the option the develop without restrictions and the option to distribute their content. What part of this would be violated by a Google marketplace?

So what you are asking for is a job?

Yes, cat-assaults on every Fox "journalist"! Where shall I sign that order?

Yes Gary, I felt those emotions! I swear, this man is getting better with every passing year.

I don't understand what this article has to do with knock-offs ...

Gosh, if that was news to you, you are really a funny kind of person who things that he should rate if an event is any good, while he has no idea about it at all.

Oh whow, that must be a new record among the dumb posts. You claimed X as a reason against the Olympics, you are informed that reason X doesn't exist and your logic is that this proves that you were right to oppose the complete olympic idea to begin with. No idea if you are more an idiot or an ass, probably just too…

Something went wrong, I didn't see a negative comment on this Dorkly!