Goatsausage
Goatsausage
Goatsausage

Thats the line car manufactures are giving to the people but think of it this way, if regulations was really such a stickler to design, how on earth could extremes like ferraris and lambo's and mclarens exist? doesnt seem regulation is effecting those products much design wise. What manufactures are aiming to produce

Notice how the mustang went from being Very cool 'size-wise' to stumpy and fat and fuggly. what happened!? the early generations were low sleek with loads of style. then came that butt ugly 1970's pinto and it altered the future of mustangs. well late 60's early 70's oil crisis put an end to muscle cars and

FAT SPLASH!!!

Due mostly to talk from Jeremy Clarkson, And TopGear both Dodge and Lamborghini dialed back the so-called insanity from there cars. Thing is the famed presenters recanted their original reviews of the viper because the car lost it "axe-murderer" insanity. So now Viper isnt as extreme as it use to be. But truly Vipers

The Nissan GT-R gets to 60 in 2.7 seconds. That's fast. Nissan doesn't think that's fast enough. Rumor has it a Nismo tuned version is coming to Tokyo this year that will get to 60 in two seconds flat. Holy hell.

FINALLY !!!! FINALLY !! FINALLY!!!, ive been sitting on that idea ever since they were complaining about space for batteries!. I was thinking. Theres so much space thruout a car for batteries if you dont design then as 1 foot bricks. Inner door panels , Upper trunk and hood panels, Roof top, I even thought of the

My personal favorite is the LFA's, the aventador's is too colorful, the c7 aint bad but aint great either. The gtr's wouldve been ok had not the dashboard look like something from the 80's. And the Reventon though interesting leaves you disappointed since the car doesn't actually fly.

I dont get it?? certainly your not complaining about the price!? You know a 911 Turbo only makes a good 480HP. 500 at best. This isnt low performance HP this is numbers rated at the wheels. big difference and even more important than HP is TQ. Torque is the key number, its the force that makes the car go. HP is

well, theres always varied trains of thought. When i think of mustang i reflect on the the best generations of the car, and none of them are loafy heavy and big. The problem with Challenger is size and weight, its too freakin big. same goes for the camaro. its actually the same size as a drop small size pickup truck.

This rendering look good, but since its modeled upon the current mustang the scale and proportions are a bit off. Indeed the Front facia is notably close to the spy photo of the test car but no one has any idea what its side treatment will look like. We do know the cars is smaller than the current car (thankfully).

Agreed. I dunno what kinda drug people are smoking when the make comparisons like a honda accord and a mustang. Indeed i certainly understand there are general shapes that find there way from one vehicle to the next, but people forget often times those shapes are a product of form following function. they also

GM/Chevy people make me laugh so much. Theyre all about 'beating' Ford. Always with blatant comments about how they're gonna trash Ford. I guess its note worthy talk from a company that went belly up. Funny thing is I just about never hear any talk from Ford towards them. Its funny. Ford has its aim on marques

Uhh, no.. im not one for buying another mans curse.

Agreed, Good thing is that new render is very far off proportionately from the actual car. especially in direct comparison with the spy photos of the test car' front facia. and no one knows what the side molding will look like. hopefully its not as plane-jane as that render. Mustang needs a good dose of styling

This is a great looking Cherokee. I get sick and tired of people so locked into one look, unable to move forward. These are the people that would stand firm and watch a vehicle sales drop to zero simply because theyre unwilling to accept change, never facing the fact that whats old is old and old things tend to die.

notable about this rendering, is that the original creator based directly on a photo of the test car. I mearly cleaned up his render and suedo blacked out the headlights and some of the grille treatment. I think its a bad move for ford to introduce design features from its lesser modes. especially features that

indeed for some odd reason people are not paying attention to the spy shots of the actual car. its true sometimes the final product differs slightly from the mules. especially the hood. and for some odd reason the Hood is not actually closed all the way in the spy shot, And notably taped over. probably do to

the last thing the mustang needs is to get any taller, thats a terrible idea especially in terms of performance for any sports car. To goal is strive for a low center of gravity, it makes the car handle better distributes power threw the chassis better and transfers weight better. the current mustang is far too tall

I use to hate Clarksons Snobbery until i understood what he was up too. he's really a fan of american car's, he grew up loving american cars which were the supercars of his generation. Clarksons bashing's made people aware of all the wrong doings with american automotive productions. It all helped in the reduction of

various all models of the C7 have carbon fiber panels. The more expensive higher perfomance versions has more. But ya have to remember. Corvettes are Mass produced sports cars. Far FAR more created than any Porsche or Ferrari. Its created to be a sportscar for the masses. And this model more than any before hand