Obama's next phone call should go like this: Mr. Musk, here is your government credit card with no limit and a room full of NASA rocket scientist that now work for you. Let's do some science like back when we were awesome.
Obama's next phone call should go like this: Mr. Musk, here is your government credit card with no limit and a room full of NASA rocket scientist that now work for you. Let's do some science like back when we were awesome.
So we're saying that putting our space program in the hands of another nation was maybe not such a fantastic idea after all?
You know what...fuck it. We have an Anti-Trust Act on the books, but nobody in our government even looks sideways at it when it means something so let's just go ahead and get rid of it. Let's have three or four gigantic telecommunications companies and they'll just go ahead and divide up our country and then we can…
Thrawn NEEDS to be in the new trilogy. And if he is, Benedict Cumberbatch is the only one who can play him.
Lets just say I have seen no evidence to suggest that we would be worse off without say the last 100 years of philosophy department output, and I did basically point that out (if you don't have philosophy you still have everything you started with) and you proceeded to tell me I was myopic. Now if you will retract…
All ethicists are philosophers, not all philosophers are ethicists, and the two are not necessarily the same. (Logic, not rhetoric). If it suits you, insert "pure philosophers" and "applied philosophers" as suits. I didn't know we were playing semantic games.
Well, when you can provide empirical data to support your ideas instead of just suggesting that I'm myopic, perhaps I'll change my mind.
No, I acknowledge that the field has done nothing SINCE Descartes except coming up with ways to justify the paychecks of professors to think about thinking and ethicists are dealing with practical aspects of human behavior (and might as well be population-psychologists) more than they are navel gazing about meaning.…
You can eat it, breathe it, sleep under it, drink it, have sex with it, defend yourself with it, or use it to obtain more of the first five things. Arguably philosophy can get you the sex part if your students are suitably naive. Not sure about the rest.
Yeah man like, why do anything!
I wonder if these wouldn't also be a great product for sidewalks, especially in northern climates. Provides lighting for safety, melts snow for a safer waking surface, etc.
Says you... as I've said, I've read the materials myself and spoken to witnesses on this very subject. There is a variety of opinion on the matter, and simply put it's outside the purview of the bible, which is also according to them a book written for "mankind's benefit."
Here is your summary of the events of Episode 1 in this video.
I thought it was called Spreadsheet Simulator
This may come as a shock to some of you but women and men are different. I hate this critique of putting a man into a woman's outfit and saying it's a dumb outfit because he looks silly. I'm guessing then that none of you want women wearing dresses or skirts ever again?
um...because boobs?
Seriously?
Valve can do wrong.