GeneralReason
GeneralReason
GeneralReason

It's got kind of a steep learning curve. The Wiki helps. So do YouTube videos. So does knowing something about orbital mechanics.

I wish that were true. A 7' dog would probably get owned by a 7' cat. They're like ninjas with built in sharp and pointy things. Now... a PACK of 7' dogs? Kitty's toast.

This person's assignment reminds me of stuff my HS physics teacher would give us. Less video-gamey but still amusing. His involved a lot of cats, cannons, trucks, and catapults (pun definitely intended).

Banks, but he writes sci-fi so it's understandable since he's got more room to work with on gender equality (women, men, people who have no gender, people who switch between them, etc.)

Brava. Well said.

That one was pretty bad. I'm not sure it isn't tied with Star Trek III in my book, though.

I never understand people's inability to realize the actor/actress is not the character. I hate the character of Sansa in the books (mostly because she's written as one long, maudlin, woe-is-me narrative) and I tend to pity the character in the show because, well, I'm not subjected to the running narrative in her

I'm sorry, but did anyone else see that quote and think immediately of John Watson on BBCs Sherlock? It made me chuckle.

Dating comes with the expectation of the possibility of a future romantic relationship, which means people don't behave as themselves, they behave as what they perceive the other person wants, which is why I don't like it.

As an Aspie, I'm not really comfortable with dating. I like to be able to get to know the person as it greatly affects my desire to become physically intimate with them. Dating is such a contrived thing. I like any progression in socio-cultural norms that moves us away from the idea of trying a relationship based on

It's like patent trolling, but with trademarks.

Honestly, I can't determine the motives of the reporter. What I can determine is that there was, in no way, any relationship between the individual's sex/gender ID and the focus of the story. It easily could have been reported that they didn't have the appropriate credentials and there was no 'science' behind the

So you say the person isn't a doctor and there's no science behind it... what part of being trans had anything to do with a putter or faked credentials? Oh... that's right, none.

How has this come to be? Easy to answer: People are more likely to bitch about something they dislike than to praise something they like. Praise is kept to oneself, complaints are aired.

I seem to recall playing Barbie & Ken with another girl my age when I was a child and it turned out similarly. They always got dowwwwwn.

Root beer. Diet Root Beer. I know you're jealous.

I think this is spot on and it illuminates the way gender/sex-biased indoctrination is largely a bad thing in all ways, shapes, and forms from a societal standpoint. There's no need to create a division of what behavior is acceptable based on the junk between a person's legs or how they identify on the gender

I don't really infer when it comes to sex.

Who says it's a two-night stand? I didn't hear anything about sex in that ad. Really, the ad seems to be more about recruiting man-candy than a sex partner.

Naw, that was pretty fuckin' sexist and misogynistic. I understand he may have not at all intended it to be that way, but that's kind of the point as well. It's indoctrinated thinking.