I'm not a scientist. So take the following with a grain of salt.

Ignoring the bad science, I'm going to see this movie for one reason and one reason alone.

The short answer is: yes, it is better. It's always easier to control the emissions from one source (even if it is a coal-burning plant) then to do the same for a hundred thousand cars on the road. Also, gas-powered cars are, at their absolute best, about 20% efficient—meaning they waste 80% of the energy contained in…

I see nothing wrong with that answer.

depressingly, most of those "class action" lawsuits are cooked up by law firms, who then go trolling for "clients." If that isn't illegal it should be.

But it isn't as terrible as it sounds. Less than one percent of the loans are serious delinquencies, which means we aren't on the cusp of a crisis. However, these could be indicators of a crisis on the horizon. Just something to be aware of. And stop buying cars you can't afford. Try that.

No kidding. Any chance of getting a huge-by-large-sized version of this, unmarked, for desktop background purposes? (2560x1600+ would be great)

So, US Air Force, do you still plan on retiring your A-10s in light of all this?

Taking a page out of Nissan's early R35 GT-R playbook. Charge more for the same.

Right engine, wrong car:

SAAB. Badass even when upside down.