@Mad_Science: Not sure that wouldn't be a blessing in disguise.
@Mad_Science: Not sure that wouldn't be a blessing in disguise.
@Tomsk the red-nosed reindeer: Ding ding ding ding!!!
@The Name's Ash78, Housewares: 100% with you.
The IIHS continues to blame poor crash performance on the small car, rather than on the far larger than necessary pickup truck analogue they use as the impact example.
Hey OPEC, we ain't gonna be yo bitch nomore, ya heah?
Unfortunately those of us who feel we are too mature to "throw spitballs into the chasm of automotive apathy" just can't get past the many and glaring faults of what amounts to a warmed over Cadavalier.
Yay, my tip made it to jalopnik! Yippee! errr...
@Plecostomus - Now with 20% more Algae!: Thank Glod for mininova.
@Its the Feds of the world as we know it.: It's bloody WELSH!
You know what? I agree with them.
@The Name's Ash78, Housewares: Tagged "Not Safe for Pants"
Not bad, but the real BRAT had round headlights and a roll hoop over the jumpseats.
@damnelantra™: Begins?
@beta.rogan: One might argue that jalopnik is in fact the real internet, and facebook is... well... I'll stop there, shall I?
Hang on... the ALMS article says Porsche pulled out of LMP2 BEFORE Audi canned the LMP1 program. Did we all miss that or ???
@The Name's Ash78, Housewares: You're an Aquarius aren't you?
@c0de: Yeah, it's a damn shame. There were whispering early on though that Suzuki would drop the WRC effort (3 years of development and poof) if the FIA pulled their "we're changing the rules for the good of the sport" or whatever.
"except with more LED lights, techie-cool door handles and bigger tires."
@Bumblebee: Yeah, that pretty much sums it up right there.
@Wes Siler: Not to mention several $6 cocktails in...