Worth adding that, contrary to an assertion in the article, the “wrong” goat is MUCH scarier looking to my eyes than the corrected one.
Worth adding that, contrary to an assertion in the article, the “wrong” goat is MUCH scarier looking to my eyes than the corrected one.
I follow you. I just see a gap when the ...uh...whatever we call this blogging empire now (Formerly Gawker Empire) is so conspicuously light on information on ...whatever the hell we call this situation .... your points don’t stick strongly, like we would see in many other classical and clear cut examples of this…
Does relative privation actually apply when the point being made is a possibly valid criticism of the editorial staff clearly avoiding a prominent hot issue in news?
It’s certainly not how I’m used to seeing the fallacy applied.
I swear to god this is a genuine question and I’m not trying to troll the issue.
Our model has two alarms, but off the top of my head I can’t exactly tell you which one that is.
Our model has two alarms, but off the top of my head I can’t exactly tell you which one that is.
It really had no impact on my similar spouse.
It really had no impact on my similar spouse.
FYI, women who do have kids get just as much judgey shit thrown at them, if not more. So whatever their decision, people need to give themselves permission to tell other people to shut the hell up and go fuck off.
So, how the heck do I get to watch this thing in Canada?
Well, at least we are being respectful of each others viewpoints.
I know criticism is often misconstrued, but the unusual character of the material made me think that feedback of all types would be productive if the editors are considering some new directions around these parts.
It did not bother me in Shattered Memories, but deeply bothered me in Until Dawn, that the concept is fractional minute long appointments with your therapist. Maybe it was the writing. “We’ve done a lot of work here” - dude it’s been like 2 minutes.
I often leave comments like this to themselves but it’s worth talking about briefly.
To me this read like oversharing and an attempt by the author to conspicuously discuss themself under the guise of an analysis that kinda-sorta failed to ever materialize.
...nothing to see here
There is no possible way to put a third row in a Tiguan. It has the tiniest little trunk imaginable.
Would we call complying with the request to search the vehicle the “right thing”?
I don’t think I would.
I trust through your cavalier change of subject you can see that we are on the same page, but just disagree about what should be on it. That is all I wanted from my day.
Question about hydrogen vehicles.
We’ve seen some failures with electric vehicles and its been the spectacular battery fire you’d expect.
How is hydrogen vehicle technology going to prevent a wreck from being as BOOM as you’d expect? (Wait, how much BOOM should I expect?)
I assure you I fully and entirely see your point.
TL;DR; no officer that phone in my cupholder I only use at stop lights.
THE INTENTION IS DEFINITELY AND ABSOLUTELY THAT YOU DON’T USE IT AT ALL. You treat it like a beer. Put it away until you are not behind the wheel. The entire time you are behind the wheel. This is on…
You are not allowed to drive while staring at your car radio. Careless driving is a crime.
I hate coming late to an interesting article because it’s so hard to see if someone has already asked this....
....but is it just me or did the victim here fail to take a number of pretty reasonable steps to alert people to her problem and obtain help? It seems pretty straightforward to get the police to respond to…