Sounds like your hatred of rich people is biasing you against a legitimately fun activity. No one at my small public course is rich and they all love the game.

Contending in back-to-back majors a year after serious back surgery suggests that yes, he is still good at golf.

Counterpoint: Golf is cool! You get to hit a ball really hard and go drink beer with your friends outside. Plus there’s strategy, competition and no athletic barrier to entry. More people should try golf!

Hot take: the people who try to dunk on Rovell on Twitter are worse and more annoying than Rovell himself. I’d make it illegal to respond to Rovell and Dril.

Oh for sure, but enough words have been written about him that until he really does something (positively or negatively) everything that needs to be said about him has already been said.

Breaking my embargo on Kyrgios clicks to remind you that I once suggested “No more Kyrgios articles until he reaches the finals of a major, retires or is jailed for committing murder on the court.” I’d like to suggest that again.

I ate at his Las Vegas restaurant in May and everything that my group had got great reviews.

No, but I really want Deadspin to have to write an article about Jerry Falwell’s football team

Ovals = passing, and passing = good, so ovals = good.

Miss Atomic Bomb (the “sequel” to Mr. Brightside, and a worthy sequel at that)

Right, they finished 5th and 6th, which given the massive resources and talent at their disposal, is a real failure. In the NBA, the Lakers have been bad (not 5th-6th bad, but 20th-30th bad) for years. The NBA’s deck is stacked, but it’s stacked towards the best organizations/teams with stars instead of whoever has…

It’s probably an unpopular opinion around here, but I don’t think relegation is ideal for anything. It’s just manufactured drama among the lowest class of a sport, and it would just cause an even greater talent drain among the bad teams in the NBA.

Chelsea, United, City and Arsenal have won 24/26 Premier League titles, and there have been 49 teams to play in the Premier League. Essentially 4 teams have a chance to win because they have insanely wealthy owners and everyone else would be thrilled to finish 5th. And that’s not even getting to La Liga or others in…

Baseball has a pretty random postseason and a player development system that actually lets good young players make an impact for the team that drafted them for 6 years or so before they can change teams, so despite the lack of a salary cap, you have more teams that can win. If this were soccer, the Yankees would’ve…

From a “labor getting as much money as possible” standpoint: Yes, a salary cap is bad.

The thing that’s being overlooked in the wave of “LeBron to the Lakers” hype is that he can’t put together a team that can beat the Warriors or the Rockets until those teams break up in 2-3 years. If he leaves Cleveland, it has to be for a team that can win now. I just don’t see him throwing away his last few prime…

Here’s something for your consideration: they are not. They’re actually very good.

You’re probably one of those people that believe soccer is “constant action” as if passing backwards in your own half is action.

Soccer is The Big Bang Theory of sports.

Penn State students/grads are the same as college students/grads from anywhere else, stereotyping them based on what some frat bros and admins did isn’t really fair. It’s not like there’s a “Cover Up 101" class - some people associated with the school are pieces of shit, I don’t think that should reflect badly on the…