GGear0323
GGear0323
GGear0323

I didn’t say they were not a feature, but they are not content. No one has ever put them in a list of reasons why a game costs what it does or has the value other people believe. Especially when you already list what those control schemes enable (simple local splitscreen multiplayer).

Well, to simplify things, what you are talking about is 10 fighters and roughly as many stages, arcade mode, versus mode, and a few party modes to have fun with. That is OK but you don’t have to act like you are drowning is content by listing everything you can think of. (Control schemes? Really?)

Those other women.

Yeah. I don’t think at any time playing the series on both the PSP and the Vita did I ever think it needed to be on a bigger screen to be more enjoyable. In this particular instance, however, the screens do look crazy busy. Maybe unnecessarily so but still, the bigger screen may be a boon to this specific title. That

So what? That doesn’t change anything.

No, it has a story and characters and cutscenes and all that. It plays exactly like you see above just against more unique NPCs some of the time and a hub level between fights.

No, its off-putting. The precise and overdone enunciating. The slightly exaggerated facial muscles. It is like watching a stage play. It isn’t natural looking, basically, even if it technically looks impressive.

The Xbox App is actually pretty nice and I think Lifehacker even wrote a nice article about it a while back. Any other questions?

No? The Xbox app and the windows store are 2 different things.

First of all, that isn’t nonsense. It’s physics. The fastest way to a bag is to run through it. The next fastest is to slide into it because you can run faster and stop your momentum in a shorter distance. The slowest way is to slow down on your feet and stay on the bag standing up. If you just stand there in the way

I think you are looking at the wrong kind of entitlement. The number of voices out there informing gamers opinions on games has only been growing. That isn’t an issue and I don’t get why you are hung up on it. I do however think people are entitled to be as informed as possible about a product they are thinking of

How is that possibly the tradeoff? That isn’t even a rational thought. The reviewers who are going to take their time with the game were going to do that either way and the people who were going to rush through the game wouldn’t have needed to if they got review copies earlier. Meanwhile, reporting on a game a few

I feel that. Armor on anything really. How can you say no to that:

I just don’t like the way they did this. Nothing more, nothing less. And like 90% of my comments are replies so it isn’t like I am chasing people down to make sure they really understand me.

You are just being very general when this is a specific issue. I am not complaining about anybody else’s DLC right now. I know damn well I don’t have a right to anything post game. They can sell whatever they want. They can sell us costume dyes for armor at $10 a pop if they felt like it. But we can complain and we

I don’t think it was ever in development for the PSP. Ys games and Falcom just never really pushed graphics all that much. It was their first Vita game and only second Ys game where they tried to give every character a 3D model. The game itself runs very well and is actually a great example of a Ys game.

I understand why DLC exists. What you seem to be forgetting is that we have never paid for literally everything a developer has worked on after release. You have the obvious stuff like patches and bug fixes that (I hope) none of us ever plan to pay for. But you have also always had these things called quality of life

That is kind of a bad way of looking at it because you are missing the point. There have been DLC in the past that we all agree hasn’t been worth the money. There has been some that makes us feel we got a bargain and there has been plenty in between that has had people debate its value. That isn’t what I am talking

It isn’t sticking because people are being willfully dishonest. You and I and everybody else knows that people would loudly deride almost any other game publisher in the world who tried to argue that these quality of life changes should be behind a season pass paywall. There would be loud complaints if EA put these

That is BS. This is what I mean when when I say people are being willfully dishonest. Look, I never said anything about the costumes or the horde mode. I have always defended the right of cosmetics being sold as DLC because they add nothing to the game but do give players the ability of self expression. Even