GGear0323
GGear0323
GGear0323

It adds bullshit tension. Or I should say the kind of BS tension I don’t enjoy. I have played many horror games over the years and have never enjoyed any of the first-person ones. Almost every horror game presents the character with various limitations in either how they move, how they explore, what they see, things

Well, a re-imagining would be to literally reinvent the character with a background and personality of the creators choosing (though hopefully keeping some important parts of the original alive in some way). In that case, it is supposed to be a new character and most probably won’t act like the one you know. The

Well, no, I wouldn’t say it is totally inappropriate. His character, his makeup, how he can handle questions about almost anything and everything about his life. These are things that matter when talking about a professional athlete who is expected to answer questions from the press, be on national television and give

.

I have always said that the Halo 5 campaign plays very well (outside of those Warden Eternal fights). But story matters and the game did drop the ball in that sense.

And maybe people like you would love to believe that because you just want to bitch and complain. Imagine that, same thing you would criticize the original posters for.

Who decides if it is good or bad? You? Whether it is a bug or not, people like you can never seem to wrap your head around the possibility that whatever criticism a creator receives, they actually might agree with it. Like, “Oh, shit. Yeah, you’re right. We got to fix that.” Because as much as you blame others for the

I guess your crazy then. I mean the article is literally about the developer telling you, to your face, that the waist is too small and they will be enlarging it. I don’t know why people are still debating.

1) Most of it has nothing to do with loopholes. A lot of taunting fouls and whatnot are judgement calls and refs let a lot of it go because they, and a lot of other people, don’t think you should try to eliminate all instances of this type of competitive passion from athletes. There is a line on a scale people don’t

The fuck? You have every right to complain if you don’t agree with something. You simply have no right to expect the organizers to care what you think. They don’t have to change anything for you but you have every right to speak up. Why would you think otherwise? Thinking you would only be talking to a brick wall is

And yet players in sports, NFL or otherwise, talk shit on the field of play all the time. They actually do more than just talk most of the time. You think all those players in baseball get intentionally hit with pitches for no reason? You think there isn’t extra pushing and shoving and jabs to the gut or whatever in

I don’t mean that it shouldn’t exist, just that it shouldn’t be $60. I mean, nothing you said negates anything I said. All the things they did is still much less work than creating the full game in the first place and, as Enfy points out, it is overall less value than we see from similar releases. Even outside the

Not always directly. The kids just have to be in the room and taking part in some larger general conversations taking place between everyone. It isn’t like people are calling their wives at work and starting with, “Hi, Mom.”

Oh, thank god. I actually lost their number so if you could do that for me, that would be great.

The amount of people who worked on it the first time is very different than the amount who ported it. On top of that, the original game was $40. I wouldn’t pay more money 5 years later just because it also comes with a movie and a demo. And it really doesn’t matter whether I played the game before or not. That doesn’t

No, that isn’t what he said;

It’s normal. If you watch enough football, you will hear probably a hundred players called “One of the best in the game” throughout a season. Gets worse in the playoffs.

I am pretty sure he does. That is where this comes from in the first place:

You will. If you hold a screen (or anything really) right up in front of you with straight arms, the distance averages about 23 inches. People obviously don’t play that way so any distance will be shorter. Sitting straight up on a chair with a portable device in your hands on your lap (like if you were commuting on a

That is for a typical 4.7" display. When you are over 6” I imagine the eye starts to notice a bit further out than that. The other chart he provided shows the distance closer to 15". That is much closer to normal. If you imagine people playing portables reclining on a couch, laying on their bed or even in a seat