It's an article. Written by a writer. It's his opinion.

There's always one.

Get out Facebook. Get out of your money grabbing phase whilst people still remotely respect you!

Here you go luke.

I'm sure, but still hearing it condensed into a neat article of evidence is nevertheless, shocking. Then again, clearly you know me better than myself.

It's not entirely surprising, but to hear the extent of it from so many sources is a little shocking.

*passes popcorn*

*Reaches for more popcorn*

*Chews Popcorn*

Heyyy Hitler.

*Grabs popcorn*

And yet you all still return here, day after day... *cue Evil cackle*

Agreed. Just because he's an internet celebrity somewhat, means whatever he does is scrutinised. That guy was a douche, so it's completely fair to be a douche back. Troll the trolls.

Oh Bluecold. You so crazy.

Yep, I was fooled into this lie once. The bottom would definitely not close.

Yeah I retract that comment. Didn't think it through properly.

Ah interesting, thanks for that response. There should be a documentary on it as far as I'm concerned. In fact, I'd be surprised if there wasn't one on astronomy photography. I might have a look around. I just find the shutter speed part of it fascinating, how they manage to prevent any motion blur.

Well, I wasn't solely referring to the quality of the product. I was talking about the change in its reputation, which is a direct consequence of the marketing.

I would absolutely love to know the photography behind these. I know, these are clearly from a telescope of some kind, but shutter speeds? What super sexual ISO are they using? I suppose aperture doesn't matter in the slightest.

To be fair it's still in basic stages. I imagine in the future this beast will be much more quiet. On the other hand, if I was in the battlefield and could only hear these big metallic steps, I'd be god damn freaked out.