It would probably look better on a PS4 or Xbox One
It would probably look better on a PS4 or Xbox One
Oh no, I am fine with the views being expressed. I would love to see for female characters to be more accurate to real life. I don't think it's a non-issue at all.
I am just sick of a person who is opportunistically jumping onto this movement, and getting tons of praise, and making money off of it. Especially when she…
You act as if she started the movement, but in reality that movement was progressing rather rapidly before she got in on it. Knowing the past can help judge a persons motives. All of these example she has brought forth have been in discussion for quite some time, it's not new.
He has more researched videos disputing…
When have I ever said that? Or did you mistakenly reply to me?
Again, there is more than just the Pyramid scheme. This list of things is valid because it shows that she has done dishonest things, in order to get ahead and to get money. Which guess what, is a prime example of what is going on with this new series of hers. The original video I posted, also shows that according to…
So we should ignore her past usage of scam, and schemes to get money?
And that "stalker" has shown her shady scam filled past, filled with pyramid schemes, promoting bunk science, and social manipulation. I guess it was a terrible idea to try and get people to actually read something.
All footage in her videos has been taken from let's plays, there is no evidence she has ever played a game, as shown by her complete lack of knowledge of the games themselves.
http://anongamer.tumblr.com/ Then perhaps this will, all the scams and schemes Anita has participated in over the years.
If you didn't mean it why did you post it in the first place? You chose your words specifically, and quite frankly it was insulting. But if you want a response here it is.
Why thank you. I worked so hard on it.
Actually no, he started the conversation off by focusing on White Males, like it invalidated anything that the video said.
As the line "completely absurd arguments from a white male point of view made me ill" As in a white male has no say in this conversation because I don't want them to.
Nice try though.
Pray tell what is this difference?
Are you insinuating that it's because a man can defend himself, but a woman can not? Or is it some other reason?
If you watch the videos, he goes point by point refuting the claims she makes.No trashing is done. He attacks arguments, not her. That's how debates work.
Then perhaps he shouldn't toss ad hominem's around like it's nothing. It's a matter of him showing his character by dismissing claims because of the gender, and race of the opposition.
By stating his argument by attacking the person in charge by adding a negative connotation to his gender and race, shows it's not an intelligent argument.
His entire argument is based off of gender, and ad hominem attacks. There is no point responding in a rational manner. As he had forgone it already.
My sister played video games when she was younger. She doesn't anymore, and hasn't since the NES, does that make her a video game player still?
The lie is that she built up this entire persona about her being a gamer, but a year or so before starting this whole campaign, she herself says she doesn't play games. As soon…
When someone starts off their argument with "white male" used in a negative connotation, there is no possible way to have a serious discussion with them.
Cool story bro.