Trying to silence those who bring up an issue is no different than arguing the opposing argument.

You're right. Scantily Clad and also Scantily Clad Boxom chicks are such a wide variety of design. Thank you for opening my eyes up to this because I clearly did not see this at all.

Oh, you don't like overly sexualized females. How about overly sexualized males

There's nothing challenging about accepting sexism in the world, honey. I hate to break it to you but there's absolutely nothing you've stated that's at any level revolutionary. But keep telling yourself that you're a specially little snow flake. It'll get you far.

Ya-aaawwnnn.

YAWN.

I'm pretty sure the response was essentially "Grrr, if you don't like my art then you must be gay". Calling someone gay is a big jump from calling them immature. But hey, Gay is a totally valid insult, AMIRITE?

OH MAN. TOTES RIGHT. Cause everyone here has totally been justifying the initial attempt at getting the point across, AMIRITE?

You're totally right. Anyone who complains about sexism is clearly totally cray cray because they're asking for progressive changes in our society to cease demeaning and belittling half of it's population.

If your response to someone critiquing your work is to make an implication that their lack of interest in your hyper sexualized character design is to basically call them gay, then yeah, there's a multitude of problematic mentalities going on behind that work, including sexism.

Hahahahah, free expession. Right, Free Expression that is clearly governed by an archaic mindset that discriminates against half of the population.

You're right. Sexism should be socially acceptable.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.

I said it looks like.

Large amount of skin might be an excessive use but the fact that there's a noticeable gap when she's already wearing supposedly thigh high boots makes it pretty clear those aren't regular shorts.

How about the fact that it's not designed to show off the full length of leg?

After seeing the game figure, yes, I see she's wearing shorts,. Looking at her promo art work? That's not at all how it appears, and in fact looks like you can see her underwear in the design.

Short shorts are defined by their ration from crotch to the rest of the leg. If they do not surpass mid-thigh then they constitute short shorts.

I'm literally not repeating myself as this has nothing to do with how much skin is showing. How about you take a look at her promo artwork and get back to me about how she's not at all sexualized.

That's not a mini skirt.