Another recipe, for a more cost-conscious margarita.

I like making this with the vodka, because it allows you to add the spice, while preserving the "purity" of the tequila. And you've gotta make it yourself - none of that pre-packaged jalapeno vodka or tequila garbage they sell.

Habanero is a bit aggressive. I usually play around with the amount of peppers I use in the vodka, and how much of it I put in the drink. If you do it right, it's got a nice kick, but not so much that it burns when you shit the next day.

Want a kickass SPICY margarita?! Ok. Soak some chopped up chili peppers and jalapenos in a fifth of vodka for about 24 hours. Strain out the peppers and seeds. You now have spicy vodka.

If you really don't think it's a ridiculous question, just have a look at Ochocinco training with Sporting KC. He, a far better athlete than any on the Alabama football team, could barely keep up with SKC, a worse team than the USMNT.

Seems unlikely, given that Spurs aren't playing in the Champions League this year. Arsenal's net sales/transfers on the other hand are hilarious.

Well, like I said, I don't know dick about their financials. But you don't break your club transfer record thrice in one summer without expecting a major windfall in the near future.

Very true. Another added complication is that they couldn't sell any of the players they've bought this summer. When the rumor came out about Monaco maybe selling Falcao because, oops, they're broke, I heard that a player can't sign for more than two teams in a 12 month period.

I'd have to think that really fucks over Spurs. As smartly as they've spent in the transfer window (and without looking over their financials), you have to assume all of those players were bought with the assumption that they were getting all the cash for Bale. If that doesn't happen, I imagine they'd have to go sell…

He's very, very good, and a lot of people consider him the third best player in the world behind Ronaldo and Messi. But, no, he's not worth that much money. Spurs win this deal if it goes through.

Hey Greg, let's be friends again.

So your real question is how long would it take a very talented, raw athlete to learn any new sport, but you wrapped it up a warm soccer-troll tortilla.

If you do love soccer, surely you realize how fucking stupid your question is, yes? You're saying Jozy Altidore - our best, most athletic player, who has been playing competitive soccer for 20 years - couldn't win a 50/50 ball (you know, one of the very specific skills he's trained for) over some SEC receivers…

We are most certainly defining the term differently. I'll go back to my very first point - how you'd express that Barca were dominating at halftime - to which you responded they had more possession. My point was simply looking at Barca's frailties and relative one-dimensionality that were exposed in the latter stages…

Precisely.

When the post first went up, you said Barca were "dominating". At that point in the game, they had more possession, but they were being outplayed in pretty much every other way. By all other objective measures, Madrid were "dominating" at the time.

Yeah, Madrid are starting to slip now. That doesn't change my point that possession alone doesn't win games.

Yes, possession is important. Yes, Barca do it better than any team.

Strictly speaking, no, more possession does not equal domination. Barca haven't had less than 50% possession in a game in like 8 years, but that doesn't mean they've dominated every game they've played in that span.

You're right, holding the ball is what Barca do. But that, in and of itself, is not what made them so…

Ok, then you meant to say Barca are dominating possession, because they always do. They had something like 65% possession over both legs against Bayern Munich, but you certainly wouldn't call those "dominating" performances, would you?