No. I reject this hairdo. This cannot be a thing.

Us Weekly: I am Jack (Nicholson)'s raging bile duct.

Somebody needs a tongue scraper listed in their backstage rider.

So... hummm... consent?

Fortunately !

Not laugh?

She was re-victimized when they locked her in a jail cell because she couldn't handle what their system demanded of her in order to get justice. That's what's going on here. I will write a "scathing article" every time that occurs. Thanks for reading.

Actually, you are wrong. The article expressly says that the other person who committed the kidnapping was testifying against the accused. So, the other person in the room when this shit when down is a pretty good witness (and prosecutors rely on snitches and co-conspirators all the time). They may not have had the…

It is not the JOB of someone who has been the VICTIM of a sexual assault to put their assailant behind bars.

Those are absolutely not the only two choices. And regardless, the solution is not "throw the rape victim in jail."

You are jumping to the conclusion that it was laziness from the rape survivor that resulted in this when there is absolutely nothing in the article to suggest that.

First, locking up a victim is worse than a rapist going free. Not only is it cruel and needless punishment of an innocent person, it will even further deter people from coming forward in the future. Second who the fuck cares which is worse? As if we have to accept one or the other.

Difficulty making meetings and purposely not attending meetings are 2 different things. In my view, the victim in this article seems to fit into the second category. You are jumping to the conclusion that it was laziness from the prosecutor that resulted in this when there is absolutely nothing in the article to…

Not to mention that when you convict the wrong person, not just do you take away someone's liberty, you're STILL letting a guilty person go free. Better to risk people getting away with crimes, than to risk people getting away with crimes AND locking up innocent people.

These kinds of binaries also allow us to be free of examining the inherent biases and problems within our system. When we restrict ourselves to asking which is worse, we eliminate the process of questioning why we are in a position to choose those binary options in the first place.

This is much worse than a rapist going free.

I am really uncomfortable with the idea that there are prosecutors trying to lower the standard from "beyond a reasonable doubt." That's not ok.

Gee, I wonder why 90% of rapes aren't reported!

Prosecutors in my current city issued a material witness warrant for a rape victim and held her in jail for several days this past summer I believe as well. She was the victim of a gang rape and was terrified to go to court... so they arrested her.

"little used" my ass. prosecutors use it regularly. Not all the time, but regularly. Its not specific to rape victims, its poor people. Prosecutors don't understand being poor.