Fizziks
Fizziks
Fizziks

Nobody is advancing that argument in good faith, because it crumbles as soon as the question of what “leftist” opinions or policies motivated his violence.

I was thinking that could be a possibility.

I’ve been hearing the right online trying to counter the fact that the El Paso shooting was done by a white supremcist, by pointing out that the Dayton shooter was a “leftist” who supports Elizabeth Warren. According to Snopes that’s true. However, that completely misses the point. Has Elizabeth Warren called Mexicans

If you didn’t know that something you said was going to offend a person you’re talking to, that’s fine, just apologize for that mistake. I don’t see anything wrong with that. However, if you do 100% know that something you’re going to say is going to offend a person, but then say it anyways, then you’re just being an

Guns are certainly more convenient for small-scale attacks, but if someone is thinking big, other methods tend to be more effective.

Will do!

Republicans aren’t stoking this fear.

The deadliest arson and deadliest car attack each killed more people than the deadliest shooting.

Actually, the difference is culture. These issues are much, much less black and white than you and many others make it. America has a sort of aggression problem with certain individuals, if you haven’t noticed. The gun is the implement, but not the cause of the aggression.

I’m stealing this!

The great misunderstanding(or self-justified delusional definitions)seems to be that it’s not related to free speech at all, it’s more actually in regards to privilege.

Violent video games, violent movies, violent music, and other violet media is available all around the world. Mental health is also not an issue that is isolated to the United States. Every country has people who suffer from some sort of mental illness. Yet, for some reasons, these places simply do not have the same

Anti-PC is given an assumption of reasonableness that I don’t understand. If people are forced to actually articulate their anti-PC positions, they’re usually dumb.

“What part of political correctness really goes beyond treating people the way you would like to be treated? Do you just want to be able to use racial slurs with impunity or something?”

You forgot reverse racism, and Benghazi! 

Basically he just seems really boring and weak-tea to get upset over and will no doubt milk this to high-heaven to make money from racists on the internet.

Agreed.  They’re a private organization.  If they don’t want somebody there, it’s not stifling free speech, because they’re not the government.

When I hear people are who are “anti-PC”, basically all they’re saying is that “I should be able to say the most vile and grosses things possible, and I should not be called out on it!” News flash people, you absolutely have a right to say nasty things, just like others are allowed to call you a PoS for saying it!

I really, really hope that your sentiment reflects a lot of 2016 Trump voters.