Ironically, the Autobahn system of highways that connected Germany was originally opposed by the Nazis. Conceived by the previous Weimar government, the Nazis rejected them, only to totally embrace the idea of a national road network once they got into power. Because the Nazis were stupid hypocrites like that.

Except then there's the concept of diminishing returns. Whereby the amount you put in get less and less value for that money. When combined with bureaucratic issues like assigning a block value for a lot of homes even though individual homes are different but for whatever reason all are regarded as minimally…

International Harvester Scout would be a good city choice.

Cool but not a pickup.

One of the few actual choices. :)

Well those were technically semi-submesibles where they could mostly submerge to cut down on radar signatures, in addition to the fiberglass bodies, but could no get away from the surface and explore the deep.

Well in human related spheres truth gets "squishy" with half-truths, almost truths, partial truths, and a slew of other variations. In the cases of these handful of examples things were paraded as true since they fit preconceptions of truth until they were proven false. And they fit enough preconceptions to hold up…

Exactly. But if you cannot prove it false it remains true.

Well that's 2. And in both of these cases they were true until someone stepped forward and was able to prove that they were false.

Well that was one incident that got traction and was proven false. What others could you present to us?

Frunky.

Thank you for sharing the source of your opinion.

Now I presume by from Italy eastward you mean Europe.

Pulling data from the WHO and WHR in 2010 and 2011 respectively lets look at these countries.
Sources:
http://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.…

It looks to be a Russian ship. The Ukrainian U402 looks like this as of 2011:

I would love to see the source for this: "The reason why the Soviet Union could never shoot down the SR-71 was because of Soviet titanium."

I would love to see some names of these countries.

You didn't but you consider education superior to infrastructure to the point where it does the lion's share of duty in driver safety in your words and implications. I disagree with this position but I understand where one comes from on this site.

Well written sir. With all that you've written here I would have to say that Senior Peg would have been an excellent gen 1 interm bomber with the B-2 (or B-3 in this case) as a follow on in a decade or so later. This would have allowed Northrop to iron out the bugs and learn from Lockheed and keep cost a bit down. …

Though the B-52 is more and more a stand-off weapon platform with the dropping of dumb bombs relegated to completely secure airspace. So the RCS size is less of an issue.

Well without empirical evidence of both cases to compare against each other, this is just pure speculation. I know we can compare country B with the US but there is no equivalent to country A that I'm aware of, do you? I know of several highly developed countries that have high investment in infrastructure and have…

Huh. Reminds me of chiptunes.

But by saying that you are saying that the millions of Kronor spent is not the majority part of the solution when the reality is the money spent to create safer roads AND the driver training resulting in better drivers are equally important. Not one over the other.