Eh, I just thought they were entirely randomized. Daily Doubles are an entirely random element, anyway.
Eh, I just thought they were entirely randomized. Daily Doubles are an entirely random element, anyway.
How in the world does playing like this guy make the game slower? The only way for the game to be slower would be if the Jeoapardy! computer needs more time to switch between categories than to show questions from the same category. Or if Chu himself is very, very slow on answering questions.
Chu is not doing this to…
Because ultimate, most people do not enjoy watching the most skilled person always winning because they're jealous of people with skill.
Why is rooting for him to fail fine? This is just a paradigm shift. He's eliminating one thing from the game and one thing alone: The chance of someone else turning the game around through a lucky Daily Double.
Why people love such an aspect and hate it when someone eliminates it is beyond me. Why root for a system…
The Hell is that even supposed to mean? The home audience never get a chance on a lot of question? Huh?
"Gaming the system" implies he's using a little-known exploit not originally intended by the game creators, like if you found a loophole in the rules that would allow you to use a jetpack in a running competition.
So... so Daily Doubles can only be found in the bottom 3 rows now? I could've sworn they were randomized once upon a time.
The only shocking thing about this is that it's taken Japan this long to open one. I mean, it's not like I spend my days imagining what kind of stores exist in Japan, but when I first read "World's first thigh high sock store opening in Tokyo", my first thought was "Wait, there wasn't already one?".
What about The Riskmaster? I play every single boardgame/cardgame/social game like you'd play Risk/Diplomacy:
By making deals, negotiating, making allies (that I'll eventually stab in the back) and plans every move out in advance, based on what I think my opponents will do.
I have actually negotiated with my closest…
You can control the natural light around the immediate vicinity, yes. But the outdoor shots. One of them has a wide view of a cityscape. No way to control that. And I guarantee you that shot of the queen had filters and colour correction added to it.
Two of the shots are outdoors shots. Lebowitz isn't a goddess, she can't control natural light. As for the bathroom shot, there's nothing wrong with the lighting in it. The filters and lights used gave the photo a sepia tone.
Apparently, somewhere down the line, Wintour or someone else decided to forego sepia and go…
Yeah, but that's been retconned out of existence now.t
Yellow suns give him his power. Plus, he doesn't constantly need to be close to a yellow sun to use his powers. If that were true, how would he use his powers at night? Underground? Inside? While in various parallel dimensions/on alien planets?
Heck, Superboy Prime and Kal-L kept their powers while in their utopia.
Our…
That was my point? >_>'
Ironically (or not, I guess), if you Google "Googleing", Google suggests you search for "Googling".
No, it really can't.
Your "proof" didn't prove what you needed to prove. They were the epitome of strawmen arguments. Not a single one of the cases you brought up was a case of someone getting the go-ahead to publish copyrighted material using extensive excerpts or wholesale footage/music/etc. of copyrighted material for profit. Not. A.…
What's with Kotaku suddenly going the autoplay route? I opened both this one and the "Trick your sons into thinking you're giving them consoles2 article in new tabs and both started auto-playing.
Auto-play is horrible.
OPG: Doesn't apply here. This case is nothing like that. I doubt that child was a Youtube Partner, i.e. could make money off that video.
Smith: Trademark issue, not copyright issue. CD cover issue.
NXIVM: This was clearly not a for-profit venture but a critique posted to a private website. This case has nothing to do…
"The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;"