So Marvel only made one other character since 1972?

While the idea of it being the same shot of Hogwarts for each year is pretty clever, I feel like it doesn’t look great when they’re all lined up like that.

Someone should tell them to switch their camera’s color space from S-LOG to Rec709.

The thing is, the test isn’t meant to judge films individually. It’s meant to change the way you look at trends across all media. So it’s not “This one passes, it’s good, this one doesn’t, it’s bad,” but more, “Look at the vast swath that don’t pass. That’s not good.”

It’s not about being able to, it’s about wanting to.

Yeah, I’ve been waiting a while for them to abandon the approach of “This is an Iron Man movie. This is a Thor movie.” etc. and just go “This is a movie that has these characters, this one has these characters.”

Yeah, I love Edward Norton, but I never bought him as Banner at all.

I feel like 8 only has a small following because he’s had a small audience. Of the people who have explored him, he has a ridiculously high devotion rate.

None of which puts it anywhere in the realm of science fiction.

Yeah, but Conan is miles from that line.

But it’s not a science fiction one.

He might blow. Has the capacity to, at least.

Windmills don’t blow.

It’s not that Obama’s list of seven scifi films and TV series... is wrong. Far from it!

Two of the entries on the list are from the 80s.

I think anyone would be ashamed to have a Conan movie on a science fiction list.

If you check the Twitter profile, it says she prefers female pronouns.

They can be what they want, and you should respect what they want to be called, just like you’d hope they respect what you want to be called. Maybe you don’t care what you’re called. That’s fine, but it doesn’t mean they have to as well.

She’s doing what she wants to do with her gender, you’re free to do what you want with your gender. Not that hard to grasp.

But she doesn’t claim to be gender fluid, or that gender doesn’t matter to her.