Could certainly do worse than Warren if we have to have a fairly entrenched Dem on the ticket, but fuck what I wouldn’t give for a Kamela Harris ticket.
Could certainly do worse than Warren if we have to have a fairly entrenched Dem on the ticket, but fuck what I wouldn’t give for a Kamela Harris ticket.
Think of it more like simply another Minecraft-related story that happens to have a lot of money behind it.
Chompette. It’s the only answer, really.
Brett has already gleefully shown that he’s happy to lie under oath and distort past events, and his best pal Mark Judge has written an entire book describing said past drunken events.
Fun(???) fact! The shiny new international disaster that is the Jerusalem embassy will not cost $500,000.
I’ve played over this exact scenario in my head so many times lately. The fact that Trump (I voted for Hillary) is most likely, in the long run, the better outcome simply because of how excruciatingly evil the GOP is, is mind boggling to me. It gives me a fucking rage stroke. It’s so backwards.
You never joined me nor did you ever intend to. If you’re so passionate and SO well-informed, why aren’t you running for office yourself? All you offer is rage and conspiracy theories, not platforms or any palpable desire to actually fix anything. And you wonder why people belittle and demean you?
Oops i have two favorites
I will never tire of the purity of bongo cat.
You’re adorable. I like you.
Find a healthier hobby other than conspiracy theory walls, champ. Like knitting, or playing in traffic.
Ah yes, the ‘Hillary murders all of her opponents’ argument. A sign of a real, upstanding, definitely-not-totally-batshit-insane-conspiracy-peddling progressive.
As a partial aside, if you haven’t watched the debate, go and watch it. It was marvelous. Beto is fantastic. I truly wish I could vote for him.
The best thing I’ve learned from this entire preview is that Woody Jackson is making damn near 200 pieces for this game. Fantastic. Absolutely fantastic.
‘Never at that party’ implies knowledge of the specific party, of which no specifics had actually been shared with him. Stop trying to invent a weird linguistic scenario in which, when viewed upside down through a kaleidoscope during the full moon on the summer solstice, he was technically telling the truth.
Considering the track record of quasi-religious hyper conservatives so far the past couple years, I’m not sure I’d take that bet.
Does your calculus change knowing that Kavenough specifically said he was ‘never at that party’, when the date or context of that party was never actually communicated to him?
Then quit, you senile piece of human garbage.
Yeah that’s fair. Can’t really disagree.
Eh. I can’t help but feel that (sadly enough) the optics of ‘Judge that lies under oath’ are literally easier to use as bludgeon in order to prevent his confirmation than ‘Judge who raped a woman in high school.’