Equalist
Equalist
Equalist

F2P pretty much spells the slow death for singleplayer games.

There is a significant debate to be had regarding sex that is completely nonconsensual; especially on college campuses, it is not uncommon for both parties to be technically incapable of consent. Clearly the issue of what the school will do if both parties are drunk needs to be addressed more clearly.

I'd probably play as one of the Tediz.

Walt is not "just as bad", he's very clearly much much worse. "Breaking bad" is not a reference to Skylar's character development.

Cheating is breaking the rules of a game system. Glitching is finding holes within a game system in order to do unexpected things that are still technically allowed by the system; you are still operating within the parameters of the system when you explore the extremes of what it allows. By definition the two are

Cheating means breaking the rules, but what rules do you think they are breaking? Not the rules of the game as programmed by the developers (no changes were made to the game as it was officially released, the faults in the system that are being exploited were all put there by the developers), and certainly not the

Well, feel free to feel that way, but that's a completely false equivalency. I know no one whose definition of "completing a book" hinges soley on reading the first and last word/page. The definition of "completing a game" on the other hand has always been subject to debate; from simply reaching the end credits, to

Every serious attempt to beat an OoT speed run record that I've seen has used this version; it would be impossible to approach the best times on the US version, simply because of the hundreds (possibly thousands) of panels of extra dialogue you have to click through. No need for an asterix as you just have to use an

To extend your libertarian point of view, while everyone has the ability to deny the legitimacy of someone else's speed run/marriage, that does not mean their denial of legitimacy has any bearing; the people with the supposedly illegitimate run/marriage are free to tell the critic to fuck off because they're wrong.

ITT: People who actually enjoy speed runs vs people who want authority over something they don't understand.

This is gonna seem like a stretch, but bear with me: this argument bears a striking resemblance to marriage equality debates.

It's just that the dialogue is faster to scroll through (you save about 30 seconds just on the opening) because fewer characters/panels need to be used. Any serious speed runner will take into account which officially released versions of the game would be best to use. I don't see why one should be required to use the

it's just abusing glitches to get to the end of the game quickly.

Well first off, there is such a thing as a botched circumcision, which can cause a person quite a bit of unhappiness. Second off, I would say that their unhappiness that a significant body modification was performed on them is a lot more reasonable than say, the desire of a parent to perform a body modification on

Heh, one of the first things I found when I looked him up:

Rather than running away from an issue which makes you feel defensive, perhaps you should examine it closely to see why it upsets you. I suspect it's upsetting partially because you subconsciously recognize that you might have made the wrong choice. Regret can be a healthy emotion, don't hide from it.

You really don't care at all what parent's do to their children's dicks? That seems extreme. You'd be fine with parents giving their kids a genital tattoo? A prince Albert? Castration? You need to draw the line somewhere. I don't care at all what consenting adults do, but it is absolutely our responsibility as a

How can anyone say this? With larger sample sizes and objective tests of sensitivity. It has little to do with your anecdotal evidence or sample size of one. And yes, there are plenty of men who have opted to get circumcised as adults (who experience a gradual loss of some sensitivity), as well as adults who have

Well, I'm not a woman so I don't think I'm woman-splaining. And it's perfectly fine for an adult male to get circumcised (for health or aesthetic reasons), this is about whether it's okay to make a permanent, unnecessary, body modification on a child that isn't able to consent. Whether circumcision should be allowed