Equalist
Equalist
Equalist

Um, guys walk around topless pretty often, especially in the summer. How is that inviting objectification any less than this woman wearing a skimpy bottom? My example was checking out a guys abs on a beach...he's more naked than the girl in the bikini I'm sure you think it's fine to objectify.

Openly ogling someone like that, turning fully around as they pass you to check out their ass, is pretty rude, especially when it's a stranger in a public place. This rudeness is magnified by about 1000 by the fact that that person is wearing a badge and looks to be there in an official capacity, perhaps even as a

I think it's important to realize that iPhone/mobile gradually taking over the market doesn't require console gamers to make an active switch to abandon their consoles. Most people are going to have a smartphone regardless of whether they buy a console, they don't scratch their heads over whether to get a smartphone

You haven't used any of the controllers, and there will be many models, so it's impressive that you're already saying it's "nothing compared to a console controller". Is impressive the right word?

Just a heads up, there's more information here.

Most likely not. Save files from BG:EE could include characters with kits that don't even exist in BG2 (like Dragon Disciple or Wild Mage). Even if you avoided using any of the new features of EE I wouldn't expect the save to transfer.

Don't forget Wizards of the Coast! They have a hand in pretty much any claim of association with D&D. From WotC FAQ on Open Game License, bolding mine:

It's either Atari or WotC causing the problems from what I can gather. I'd definitely put my money on WotC.

They definitely thought they had the contracts cleared. During development they mentioned quite often the different limitations they had for adding content to the game, many of them being fairly intricate. I recall there being a lengthy explanation in one thread on their forum of how they could create new characters,

I didn't feel scammed at all. It gave new characters, quests, kits, dialogue etc. They delivered pretty much everything they felt they could contractually. The developers talked a lot on the forums/twitter about the limitations that were placed on them for adding content to the game (lots of requests were labeled cool

I don't remember what my exact strategy was, but I didn't have much trouble with Sarevok. The traps weren't a problem since I had my party in a safe position at the bottom-left of the room and used one guy to activate the fight and draw the attackers toward the rest. I had a party of 6, with my PC a dragon disciple

It seems like you missed a rather significant point, which is that in a locker room or urinal situation, where you say men are more likely to get embarrassed about penis size, they are usually flaccid, whereas in a sexual situation, where you say men don't feel as insecure, they are usually erect (and if they're not

The only time a man can be brave is when he is afraid.

Does that mean Conker is also Microsofts? :( I'm not clear on which Diddy Kong Racing characters Nintendo got to keep, but I'm guessing it's not a good sign that Conker and Banjo were both taken out of the DS version.

Well, really it costs $499 plus your soul, since you have to buy an XBone first.

Can you be more specific? What is the misconception about how the Xbox one works?

Edit: Too slow, already explained.

This is like when people tell me I'M the one who's taking their use of gay as an insult to be homophobic, and they didn't mean anything about homosexuality at all, so the problem is in my head and not their usage.

That...is not how I remember it. MK was, to the people I played with at least, seen as a much more basic game, more known for shocking violence than gameplay; KI was all about the combos, which could get absurdly long.

I'm not clear, are you challenging the idea that this is a rape joke or the idea that it's not acceptable to make rape related comments when playing a violent video game?