Equalist
Equalist
Equalist

"has mastered his body when its pumped full of adrenaline" through what, smashing controllers when you get mad? That's quite some mastery you have. You also have such an understanding and appreciation for legal consequences that you would be willing to assault someone over a video game if only you had access to the

Most people think of themselves as reasonable human beings. It's plainly obvious to most people reading this comment that you are not actually a reasonable human being, given admissions like breaking controllers, scaring family members, and a desire (willingness even) to punch other people in the face over a game.

Uh, that graph is gun deaths per 100k people, so it adjusts for population size. Even with that adjustment, the US has way more deaths. I also don't see how square milage is more important than population size.

Anyone have any ideas on the significance of her tattoo? "all love, A" seems very cryptic.

Well it's been reversed plenty of times as well (just off the top of my head, Rachel had an inappropriate relationship with her personal assistant on Friends) ...it's really common to sexualize power imbalances, like teacher/student and boss/employee relationships. People are into what they're into, and I don't think

They're just trying to catch up.

This.

"There are some games the should just not be made" is clearly advocating for less art.

Why are employers allowed to pay their employees less than minimum wage and say that the customers will pick up the bill? This seems like the actual problem; a tip is supposed to be a bonus/treat, not an expected/mandatory part of someone's wage.

Console + Controller = 99.99

Well, what these people disgusted with the article are arguing is that a child performing oral sex on another child has definitely been abused, so even a single counter example shows that this is not actually the rule.

It doesn't matter that objectification of men isn't as rampant as objectification of women, both are negative things that should be avoided, and both are serious problems in modern society. Objectifaction, much like rape, is a topic that many feminists seem to feel men should not feel passionately about because they

No one is jerking off to commercials with sexy women in them either, there's porn for that, but that doesn't mean theres not lots of objectification of women in those not-jerked-off-to media. Objectified =/= jerked off to, and the any image focused on attractive thighs will almost certainly also feature either ass or

Participating in the very thing you are railing against crosses from satire to hypocrisy.

They certainly constitute the type of objectification that Jezebel normally gets up in arms about when it's directed towards females. These people are almost always athletes who have worked hard to get good at their sport, and instead they are being reduced to hunks of meat that are pretty to look at. I've heard

Yea, something tells me they wouldn't be so OK with deadspin running a bouncing boobies article every day of female athletes.

Oof.

She texted her to let her know she couldn't make it after the the scheduled hang out time, or at least close enough to it that author had already arrived and was killing time to wait for her. Wasting someone else's time is absolutely something one should apologize for. Texting simply "baby is sick. not making it"

So? That doesn't mean your logic makes any sense that if it were really canceled they would "back it up with proof and not just say an anonymous source." If they are told by an anonymous source and that is the only source they have, all they can do is pass on the information and let readers know to take it with the

You don't have any idea how journalism works do you? If the source asks to be anonymous, they absolutely can't just decide to release his/her name; doing so would ruin their credibility as journalists, potentially cost the source his/her job, and discourage anyone else with sensitive information from coming forward.