EagleDelta1
EagleDelta1
EagleDelta1

It’s probably important to note that popular mainstream distros also have Raspberry Pi images (mostly for the Pi 2 B and newer). CentOS 7, Ubuntu 14.04 and newer, and Arch are a few.

Only real benefit here is that if you are using Raspberry Pi for standard server tasks (I have one setup as a DNS server), CentOS and

I love that you miss/ignore (not sure which) that it is also getting a Mac/Linux port, which makes up a combined 10% of the Desktop now (and growing) - no small number:
http://www.pcgamer.com/overall-window…

Now playing

There’s also a point in ROTJ during a cut to Admiral Akbar ordering an assualt on the Super Star Destroyer and you can see a Mon Calamari Cruiser decimate an Imperial Star Destroyer.

They are to a certain extent. They are only enforceable up to a certain point. I’ll just quote the guy I know that is a lawyer:

Most non-compete clauses that have that kind of language are considered unenforcable if actually taken to court. This lawsuit has more of a “He worked for Wildcard while still employed by Trendy” or “This is too expensive to actually take to court, so let’s settle”

I would agree with you except, the smallest ship you “pilot” in EVE is a Frigate. Not one-manned or Small Crew freighters like X-Wing/TIE Fighter/Freespace/Wing Commander.

Non-compete clauses cannot prevent someone from working in their field at all. I can’t speak to all states, but I worked in NE recently and now in KS. A non-compete clause that prevents you from working with a direct competitor of your employer is generally enforcible, however a non-compete clause that prevents

The problem is that if a developer wants to utilized UWP for their game in Win10, they then have to develop in a second environment for any number of additional platforms they want because UWP is Win10 and Xbox ONLY. A LOT of people are still on Win7 or Win8.x

Not the same:

You’re missing a second “sudo” in your command example. Since you’re executing 2 commands consecutively, sudo needs to be executed on both of them:

That’s your prerogative. Just saying that the developers announced almost a year prior to release that there wouldn’t be normal console/controller support, getting mad now just means that:

That’s your right, but they made it clear they weren’t supporting Console/Controller well ahead of the release. Only reason Steam Controller is getting any love is because it has KB/M Emulation. Getting mad about it makes no sense at this point

Games like this are the exact reason why Valve created the Steam Controller.... to play games that don’t support a “traditional” controller on the TV. 2K games almost always have pre-built 1st Party controller configs for the Steam Controller as well and they tend to work really well.

By that I mean that Ruby, Python, PHP, etc are all written in C. Everything funnels back to C then to Assembly (to some extent)

So is Ruby. Used heavily by Github, Hulu, Gitlab, Puppetlabs, Chef, Logstash and a multitude of other Webapps and Enterprise tools.

I understand what he said, but if manufacturing, engineering, and development costs can’t be recouped in sales, then it may as well not exist either. Like Steam Machines, I think VR is going to be a long term game in the market. The initial releases aren’t designed to sell millions, maybe not even thousands. As time

No, actually a basic statement was released. As an Engineer myself, you never give out details to customers/users before the RCA is complete. Giving incomplete details actually tends to cause more panic/outrage than making them wait, simply due to fact that the average customer/user doesn’t understand how the backend

Companies with significant technical infrastructures have very specific, industry standard procedures to follow after an incident like this called a “Root Cause Analysis”. This always happens before communication comes out to describe the situation.

There is something in IT called a “Root Cause Analysis” after a major incident like this. Under no circumstances do you or your team(s) go into detail about the issue until at least the first phase of the RCA is complete. Doing so may end up giving non-technical users, customers, or management the wrong idea of what

This is NOT a cybersecurity issue. This was cached ephemeral data. No one ever actually accessed anyone else’s account. People saw some cached user profiles, not actual CC data. No one was actually authenticated to the system to make changes to another’s account.