As an outsider, it just seems so stupid to watch the US struggle with this issue for years. Just suck it up and make everyone get insurance and have the government run essential health services as a non-profit.

My answer is this: he wasn’t (hork) “just” violent against women. ***He was violent and murderous to the people he claimed he wanted to liberate.***

You’ve conveniently forgotten that he killed many of his own people. “How many of my own people have I killed to get here?” You’ve glossed over how he murdered his “ride or die” girfriend without any remorse, slit the throat of a black woman he could have easily disarmed, and choked out a mother who was preserving a…

Killmonger’s motives were questionable? Uh, he wanted Black folks around the diaspora to be free. What’s the question?

Watch how Killmonger treated every woman he ran into, starting with the security guard and finishing with the priestess he almost strangled, and then tell me with a straight face that his “Wakandan empire” wouldn’t have been a patriarchy that puts Margaret Atwood to shame.

Wanted Black men to be free. There’s a difference.

#TeamNakia b/c it’s more than one way to start and win a revolution. I said this on another site, and it applies here also... “I think the film could use a thorough Fanonian reading but I will not do so here... In short, regarding the age old question: “can we use the master’s tools to destroy the master’s house?” I…

So how do you feel about the women he killed?

It is NOT a “significantly large” portion of the population - no matter how many spongers this guy personally knows. Actual research backs up this. What research doesn’t back up? Apocryphal comments from anonymous persons who may have a political agenda.

OK, since you’re already ungrayed, I’m wondering how exactly you know that “a significantly large portion of the population” abuses the system and has no desire to pull themselves out of poverty. Maybe it’s just a significantly large portion of your friends and family.

I suggest that if food stamp recipients are to be questioned about what they do with their taxpayer funded benefits, then defense contractors should be too.

Yeah, I’m often told by people that they prefer dogs over cats because they find litter boxes gross. Like, more gross than having to bag up dog poop in the rain? I’ll never understand.

I have to appreciate the irony that the animal that actively cleans itself and chooses to crap in scented gravel is the one less likely to be accepted.

In my experience, a sizable majority of dog owners.

I absolutely want to fight about this. While I’m not anti-dog, per se, I am anti many dog owners. I don’t own any dogs, don’t plan to ever own dogs and think it’s not too much to ask four things of dog owners:

You know what I hate? The fact that “pet friendly” is usually code for “dog friendly only, no other pets”. Notably for hotels. Thank goodness its been years since I’ve had to travel such distances with a cat that required a hotel stay, but it does happen (especially for moves) and most of the time when a hotel says…

And also most these places as far as I’m aware still have shit policies when it comes to childcare yet now everyone and their mum can bring pets in.

Let’s not pretend that Amazon and other companies are allowing people to bring their dogs into work because they care about employee happiness. They are doing it because employees will work longer hours if they don’t have to go home to take care of their dogs.

If a Republican candidate was anti-abortion, conservative and in favor of common sense gun control, Republicans voters would still vote for them over the Democrat. The problem is, in primaries, the NRA gives money to pro-gun candidates, tilting the scales in their favor.

Also going to s/o Paula’s Choice as a quality alternative. Way better smelling too