Why would you side against someone complaining about a barking dog? Being rescued doesn’t make them any less noisy. The person wanting to rescue animals should do so without leaving the pet unsupervised and disturbing neighbors who didn’t sign up for that.

How come everyone in the world has to fucking make room for peopl who don’t care about them? Why should he have to allow cops into his gym and why should he have to facilitate a dialogue? That is some white nonsense. Every fucking time someone says “enough” there is someone else giving them the shit for not trying…

Yeah, they do. I call earth home how about you?

Well when cops stop shooting unarmed black people, assaulting black folks, targeted policing for racist reasons, etc. we can talk about them getting their gym privileges back.

You might want to learn some definitions. This is not discrimination. You don’t have to be a cop.

He already said he wouldn’t stop a cop from doing their job, they just can’t workout there. Did you not read the whole article?

Without looking too far into it the owner seems to be pretty political and an activist. He probably doesn’t support American colonialism and aggression. I don’t see an issue with someone extending that lack of support to the people actually doing the fighting.

So stealing.

I’m curious...what would the compromise be? Half a child that they share with another family?

I’m sorry you find things repugnant, I’m not here to debate you or make you change your mind and I never said I was.

Google has a duty to foster a safe and productive work environment, by law. So factor that into your silliness about equal views and there’s no right and no wrong horse shit.

The first amendment allows people to express those ideas without fear of repercussion from the government. That’s not the same as being told “hey, shut the fuck up.” Or being denied a platform by your peers, through which you would spread those hateful views. Or being fired from your job for emailing your coworkers…

You do understand that there is no First Amendment violation in a private employer firing someone?

Absolutely not. Unreasonable positions include things like advocating genocide and white purity and all sorts of alt-right goals. Our grandparents flew across the world to blow away people for expressing and instituting fascist views, and rightfully so. Discourse is the tool that fascism uses to legitimize itself,…

There is no room for reasoned debate with unreasonable positions. We don’t give Nazis a platform either because just by being able to be there they’re being validated. The constant white american cry “reasoned debate” has resonated across the history of this country. “Well why can’t you be reasonable and accept…

To be fair, there’s more evidence than that. Anna’s podcast is predicated on stage giving advice she’s unqualified for. Pre-election, a woman called in asking what to do about her boyfriend who loved Trump. Anna’s producer and best friend screened the call for Anna and said, “I knew you’d have some thoughts about this…

I would generally say that any person who brings up IQ “differences between people” is trying to justify their racism with a misunderstanding of social science.

It’s actually funny, cause a century ago, women consistently scored lower on IQ tests than men. Then we started formally educating women and they entered the paid workforce, and their IQs shot up. They are now consistently a touch higher than mens’ IQ scores.

is trying to justify their racism with a misunderstanding of social science.

Right! It’s almost like people who go to better schools and are exposed to more educated people in their immediate vicinities and interactions might have an opportunity to increase their IQs that someone less advantaged wouldn’t. Not like anyone is born with a 170