DreamSequence
Bitcoon
DreamSequence

This I never understood. It's not murder because some dude in a hat told you to do it? Is this why 9-11 was a tragedy (With some 1000 deaths) when World War 2 (with tens of millions, if I recall, and at least hundreds of thousands of them innocent civilians) was "oh just those silly humans, fighting more of their

I'm... not entirely sure you even read what I just wrote. (okay, for some reason all my paragraphs got messed up even though they looked fine before? This commenting system sucks sometimes)

Arbok and Butterfree are pretty much unchanged, but other than that, nicely done. :)

This is truly a great day for gamers.

GTA? I would think a game like Dynasty Warriors would account for a lot more murders.

No. Just no. This game requires a high level of precision which is nearly impossible given the control scheme. Your success depends on whether a large number of nearly random variables just so happens to work out in your favor. I've worked hard to time and place my shots perfectly and hit JUT THE RIGHT SPOT only to

Keeping old systems is a hassle. And some just suck. I don't know if you've tried playing an N64 recently, but I'd really rather not deal with those crazy controllers and their terrible analog sticks. And having more machines to plug into the TV? Just too inconvenient. God forbid you don't have the right hardware to

*skims list*

oh BOB SAGET!!

This so much. Angry Birds has a difficulty level that almost requires this sort of thing. The reason anyone thinks it's hard is because they've built the game so that without this sort of assistance you have to retry a level 50 times before completing it, no matter how carefully you try to place shots.

Why would you say that?

That wall of text hurts. Next time, use some paragraphs.

I saw Monster Hunter and SOTC on there and gamergasm-ed.

Looking at games like Infinity Blade 2, they're already not too far off from what the Vita can do. Mobile processors and GPUs are rapidly improving and getting a lot smaller. The iPhone itself has seen two major increases in computing power within the last two years or so. I don't doubt that it will surpass the Vita's

Did they happen to have any lawnmowers at the wedding? Were the dogs allowed inside? Was it actually outside? Was the flower girl a pig in a nasty dress?

How many is "very few?" Because I'd say there's at least 30 on there that are completely worth buying, and 10-20 more worth giving a shot. Those are also some of the most unique games this generation, focusing on gameplay over all else. It's hard to find that kind of thing on the 360 and PS3.

Which is sad, because if you look at the sales numbers, the only things that sold were the huge Nintendo games. Everything else sold minimally, and those were most of the Wii's finest games. Those guys with Wiis sitting around gathering dust have almost certainly never played the best Wii games.

The problem with your "pure power" logic is that smartphones are constantly improving. I'm almost 100% certain that the Vita will not be the most powerful portable device on the market in 2 years of its release. By iPhone 5G/5S or iPhone 6 Apple's devices will be sporting more powerful processors and equal or greater

I doubt a new iteration is coming within even a year from now. Like I said to Jackstick, the 3DS is a perfectly fine device with a good number of excellent games and a quickly growing library. The software is robust and well-thought out and the online shop is actually a rather thriving location for some excellent

I don't think it's happening. Not at E3. Not once has Nintendo ever released a second handheld iteration so soon after the one before it, unless you consider the DSi XL, which honestly doesn't count. (at least, I don't remember a single case where they did it so soon)