DrScientist
DrScientist
DrScientist

what about the safety regulators?

yeah. their ad wasnt even bad. almost good. but tide won that one handily.

the fear of having his car flipped is what led one driver to carelessly speed backwards through a crowd striking and killing one man. i think that was ‘03? ‘04?

agreed

Do keep in mind the numerous “celebrations” that took place in Boston following patriot Super Bowl and Red Sox championship and World Series wins.

but there werent any clothes in the jeep ad.

it’s because youre not IN high school anymore.

nobody’s mentioning the building.

right. then it becomes a strategic decision:

it’s a non-zero number. and therefore a legitimate commercial target.

you don’t get it. you just don’t get it.

probably not a problem per se, but if they can bring a few more interested female fans on board rather than female eyes rolling at classic stereotypes, i’m sure they’d be happy with that.

i’m barely a feminist, but all of your examples choose to present their brand image in such and such a light. on the other hand, fast food companies, quick lube services, big box stores, wholesale restaurant supply stores do not. each industry and company can choose what identity they wish to present to the public,

by no means am i expert on this movement, but i believe that establishing a paid job that at its core sexually objectifies women (or anyone) opens the door for those in charge to take advantage of their position, and those objectified to feel as if they have no other option but to submit to the whims of the

there HAS to be an airdump or equivalent out there.

i have no idea how airbnb handles insurance... or rather... how airbnb users handle insurance. or... if they are all just out on their own...

youre right it is a great idea. the problem is the insurance. noone is going to underwrite this in a way that makes it affordable.

but youre not profiting on the vehicle maintenance. youre profiting on the loan of space.

for some reason, that whole setup reminds me of...