Better they exist with ad breaks than not exist at all.

It seems to me the draw of a subscription to any of these streaming services is twofold: the buzzy new, original shows/movies (each of the streamers has at least a few), and the back catalog of older TV shows/movies that will sustain subscribers between seasons of the new stuff.

By depleting the second part of that…

Two wrongs don't make a right.

Good point! If she doesn’t make your personal dick hard, she definitely deserves to be bullied for aging or gaining weight. 

i prefer people to be real and just straight up call someone a piece of shit if that’s what they’re being. cosmetic surgeons are constantly doing this online to famous people and they’re so often wrong. i guess that’s the influencer part, they know they’re full of shit but that idiots will buy what they’re saying.

one…

As long as they throw in a line next season about Clark helping some rogue time travellers bust out of time jail I’m good. 

No. All she’s said is that her eldest has non-standard clothing preferences. It’s not clear what he identifies as, but it is fairly clear she doesn’t want to talk about it in public. From the Glamour article:

I didn’t really like Willow and I still think it should be available as long as Disney+ is around. Dumping the shows with no way for people to watch them is ridiculous. It’s all about the money.

We really need to close whatever loophole let’s you write off already completed (and most of the time aired!) projects as tax write offs. What.

This doesn’t make a lick of sense to me. Shows like Little Demon and Willow were heavily marketed by Hulu and Disney+. Pulling them from the service less than a year after they aired just seems like throwing money away.

oh, come on - bob belcher.  anybody who goes undercover as a bronie wins hands down.  non-canonical!  non-canonical!

Look, I’m not saying all 23 year olds are idiots, or that a young woman, or man, can’t date someone older. If Florenece Pugh and Zach Braff are happy together, that’s their business.

I’ve been watching Passion of the Nerd’s Buffy recaps on YouTube lately. One of things that the reviewer keeps bringing up is the issue of choice and how it’s a recurring theme throughout the show. “You have a choice. You don’t have a good choice, but you have a choice” (from S2E7 “Lie to Me”).

My man, if it was Eliza, at the time Buffy started, he was in his mid-30s and the boss of a network show and she wasn’t even 18 yet. I promise you, you can blame him! 

It’s really telling that it seems like a lot, if not all, of his post divorce relationships were with women in their early twenties.  I don’t mean this is some kind of pedo way. Just, if you’re in your 50s and all of your relationships are with 23 year olds, you’re definitely not looking for an intellectual equal.

The best time to delete your comment was right before you hit “publish”. The second-best time to delete your comment is right now.

Yeah, that was such a weird take that I’m still reeling just from having read it.

spoken like a man who’s never had one ounce of sex.

No we can 100% know. If central part of my relationship is monogamy then you keep to that. If at such time you realise monogamy isn’t for you, you end the relationship. It’s truly not that difficult. If you’re really twisted up about take a long weekend to a hotel and wank it out. There are so many steps in between “I…

When he claims he was powerless when it came to sleeping with Buffy actresses, I was genuinely shocked. How does he not understand that that’s not an acceptable response. This article isn’t going to rehabilitate this dude’s reputation.