Exactly. And if you have a ton of ps2 games, why not just keep your ps2 when you upgrade?

When the ps3 came out, everyone bitched that it was way too expensive.

Stop making so much damn sense.

nope!

That's exactly why all sites that post reviews should disclose exactly how they played the game, and what they played it on, like you guys do.

Just because some sites put up a spoiler warning doesn't mean I'm wrong.

Good point. I like the idea of positive, rather than negative incentives.

They did want you to know, or they wouldn't have shown it to the press, allowed the press to talk about it, or allowed several sites to post it as a headline.

That was a typo, it was actually 1up.com, not ign.

Actually, a lot of sites didn't. Gamesradar, for one. I saw an article on IGN titled "If you think the Joker dies at the beginning of Arkham, you're a Sucker". Both sites had titles on the main page, no spoiler warnings.

It's actually a very poor example. It happened at the end of a story, and was the main twist. Also the makers of the movie/book didn't release the information to every movie blog/site before anyone knew the story.

You like to call me ignorant, but I don't think you know to what a "right" is.

Wow, big Harry Potter fan, huh?

Do you play Rocksmith? Do you play a real guitar?

You forgot "I know that talking a bunch of fanboy shit will get a lot of people to notice me, which apparently my game isn't good enough to do".

Billy Gates Fun Bucks®?

I haven't seen Scream yet! Knowing what happens in the first scene ruined the whole rest of the movie for me. . .

I didn't miss the point, I just think you guys are a bunch of whiny bitches.

Just seems kind of rediculous to cry and bitch endlessly about a site passing on information that the makers of the game WANT you to have. Does that count as a spoiler?

Fucking hilarious!