This kind of article is my least favorite.

Calling someone a slimy bigot sure is easier than addressing different ideas, isn’t it?

Depending on where he’s from, there is a high likelihood that they test better than non-sex workers in the US.

I’d love to know what, exactly, you think this has to do with the first amendment. Last I checked, Univision wasn’t the government.

Univision is Congress?

You can insure anything, it’s just a question of premiums. That’s where my question lies. If Lloyd’s want $80 mil to insure it, you wouldn’t bother. At $10 mil you may have some thinking to do.

I can’t think of an insurance company that would risk underwriting something that involves putting a payload on top of a giant bomb and hoping the explosion only goes away from it.

I assume this is parody. Otherwise it’s just insane.

That is a terrible idea.

overwatch is the uncontested king of dissonent narriative. hey, lets make interesting characters, with backstories that carry motivations, friendships and rivalrys, and then throw all that in a wood chipper and turn them into quipping ambulatory guns who have no meaningful action to do other than kill each other.

Right, same, but for Castle in the Sky.

I liked the video better the first time I saw it, when it was called the Iron Giant.

“I’m gonna fight my destiny of killing a bunch of noobs... by killing a WHOLE bunch of noobs!”

A “choice to alter his destiny,” huh? They must’ve cut the epilogue where he realizes that the forest is pretty boring and he’s actually going to go kill thousands of people after all.

You can't possibly be serious.

There is a competitive advantage to having more testosterone. I was trying to word it differently than QCIC, but there's no other way to say it. Miss Chand is not strictly a biological female.

Are you going to try to argue that men are not bigger, stronger, and faster than women? Really? Must be why all those (juiced) women's world 100m records are about a full second slower than the men's huh? Get the fuck out of here idiot.

Yes but men have a undeniably larger physical edge over women. That is not arguable.

What if the massive genetic edge was that they were 5 inches taller?