It wasn’t great, but it certainly didn’t deserve the reply it got from an employee.

I guess he played in Seattle for a season or two, but he’s definitely a Pittsburgh player.

Steve Largent was incredible, but I always think OTs deserve more love. Jones only allowed 23 sacks in his entire career, and that’s why he should be in the conversation for the best Seattle player.

Hannah was a guard. He was amazing though.

I don’t know how I forgot about Pace (I was a big Faulk fan) and Ogden. McDaniel and Matthews weren’t nearly as dominant towards during the few years of overlap they had with Jones, though.

Nah. I still think Walter Jones. He only allowed 23 sacks and had 9 penalties in his 12 year career. That’s insane.

*cookie stuff.

Just out of of curiousity, who would you say is best in Seattle history? I think Richard Sherman. He’s the best. JK. I’d go with Walter Jones. One of the best LTs for more than a decade. The only OT that was arguably more dominant at any point during Jones’s career was Tony Boselli, whose career ended much earlier…

Oh man, “Buddy Holly” was the first music video I had ever seen on a computer.

Dat sparring sequence. Hot damn.

Oh come on. That was a pretty amusing burn.

* “Hates microtransactions...HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Stop being poor, you piece of shit, and quit complaining.”

Did you reply to the wrong person?

Teams have to if players are injured during a game or practice.

I think that was in response to the blindside hit flag on Heath, which was a pretty bad call. I would have been more concerned with the unconscious dude on the ground than 15 yards right before the half, but I’m not Dez Bryant.

Plainspeak lack detail. Can’t have that in legal documents. That’s also why they’re so dense. Every. Single. Possibility must be addressed.

I think you missed his point. The need to periodically upgrade is his reason not to get a PC.

I think everyone missed your point.

It’s around the level of Israel and Palestine, but more reserved, and if the Nazis were Palestinian. However, East Asians are united against non-Asian groups. It’s a strange dynamic. Think about those families with feuds between siblings, and simmer that for a few thousand years.

If there’s no PvP, why would any of this be of consequence? I’ve only played the first one, so maybe there are PvE mechanics that I don’t know from the second.