Dat-Wontfly
Dat_Wontfly
Dat-Wontfly

This is not relevant at all to the quote you pulled out. You are derailing The Gaysian's point with a tangent about how the prevention of rape might, perhaps, in a statistically insignificant way, be a problem for you. However. Most people would agree that two intoxicated people hooking up is not rape. What Erin

I'd love to see those things go, actually.

If you're trolling, I'm about to become guilty of feeding you, but...

First of all, I never once said it would be better for a man to go to jail and end up on a sex offender registry for the rest of his life, blah blah blah. You posted that yourself, with quotes around it, as if I had said it. Then you posted my quote, with your own spin underneath it.

The author/publishing company it seems. Since they've been pushing this book as a great way to save your marriage/sex life, a perfectly healthy example of BDSM relationship and as great way to explore BDSM.

It causes overuse of the term "inner Goddess", though.

These girls probably didn't complain about that so your comment is redundant.

Oh you said "girls" as if they are all one entity. Well just so you know, they are not all the same. They don't all think the same. If that isn't generalising...

What? You mean it's almost like we women don't all share the same hive mind? Holy shit! What a revelation!

Some constructive criticism, thehunchbackofnotredwayne, since I see you are interested in pursuing a path in sexist trolling: you need to commit (I would suggest you fact-check, too, put that's probably beyond you — Maddie is a staff writer here, just FYI! That is a full-time position, and also a vagina is not

We really only need the last one.

Right— "too much responsibility for their own actions" is what they're really saying. They're twisting themselves into knots to find a way to make women shoulder SOME responsibility for men's own actions.

Rape is the only crime on the books for which arguing that the temptation to commit it was too clear and obvious to resist is treated as a defense. For every other crime, we call that a confession.

Yep, that's pretty much the answer. Just because the media doesn't acknowledge women are visual creatures doesn't make women any less visual. If men are ever shown being sexy, it's considered gay because straight women couldn't possibly appreciate a man's abs or firm butt or handsome features. Sometimes I feel like

Now playing

This is my favorite Hiddles video ever. SERIOUS TOM IS SERIOUS.

Not shocked. Beyond comfort and familiarity, I think a lot of the difference could be chalked up to the focus on mutual orgasm during intercourse. Same-sex couples engage in more turn-based sex, while straight couples tend to focus on each partner reaching orgasm during vaginal intercourse. Many women find it

The most important takeaway from this story is #notallmen, clearly.

"a half-Japanese, half-American contract assassin who specializes in taking out his targets by making it look like death by natural causes."

I'm giggling so fucking much right now...and you have no idea why...

I like smart trolls. I don't like trolls who can't think properly, really. Finding people sexually attractive is NOT the same thing as objectifying people. Nowhere are the cartoon princes portrayed as objects as for instance women are in many commercials. Being the "object of desires (or of respect, or of attention)"