I didn't say they always had the "Yes-No" reviews, I said that there's always been a "Not Yet" review along with the "Yes-No" system (thought when they first started they called it "Maybe" I believe).

If Super Metroid was suitable for me when I was six, I'd say it's not much of an issue.

That's only if you spill Mountain Dew.

Isn't there some sort of auction house system in the game? I dunno, I've never WoW'd myself.

"1-2-3-4-5? That's the kind of password an idiot would have on his luggage!"

It's better than posting a "No" after the game came out and having people bitching about how they already bought it, like it matters.

Kotaku has always had the "Not Yet" option, they've given it to a few games before this one.

Ascension felt like more of the same, and the story felt lacking in my opinion.

I doubt any review flat-out says "Gears is better that God of War".

I dunno, Lara's boobs still seemed fairly big in the new game.

RIP best show ever.

Oh yeah, I know. And really Ubisoft isn't out of the water just yet, people still despise Uplay (on PC at least, console users are just glad they don't have to pay $10 for it if they get it used or something silly like that). They do seem honest when they say they want to make it way less intrusive and bothersome for…

Thank god.

Apparently it has something to do with accessing the games de-bug mode, but I dunno all that much about it really.

The thing with Ubisoft though is that they did come out and admit it, they even said they wanna work on lowering how intrusive Uplay can be for PC games.

True, but now that 38 went under EA gets all the profit from the game, no royalties go towards the developers anymore (since, ya know... they don't exist now).

The game is free, but you have to pay for tables.

To The Moon isn't just a flat-out download, the demo is basically the full game, you unlock the whole game with a product key.

You know, if you want to be anonymous you are suppose to EMAIL them, not just post it publicly.