Says a lot about Ferrari that their exclusive only-for-true-Ferrari-lovers car is being allowed to be driven by this piece of shit.

SHIT. Beat me to it. +1

“Ask Rhode Island... Not profitable, but consistent.”

Well that sucks. Can't say Jezza didn't bring this on himself, sadly.

Does LH have one with the "upgraded" fuel tank that fixes the car-bursts-into-flames bug?

CC: Elon Musk

Not in NYC. Laws (and enforcement by NYPD and DMV) here are so lax you can pretty much mow down a family while texting and not get so much as a ticket. If he was Joe Schmoe and did that here, he'd face no consequences aside from insurance stuff.

"Our cars are for manly bros, bro."

What about this car is outlandish and impossible? The horsepower, acceleration and weight are all 300% plausible, and it's designed by an engineering firm that kind of knows what it's doing.

It says they're the guys building G-wagons for Merc and developed the aluminum bonding used in the Mercedes SLS and Rapide. I think they might be for real...

Hey, Ford has a 3-cylinder and does sporty stuff nowadays.

There is no way that is real*, but if it is, I'll go ahead and sign up for whatever indentured servitude program they have to buy one of these.

Holy shit, I've eaten* at that Gyro King. Terrific food, but damn.

I actually kind of like this. Killing two birds with one stone for Ford, and critically one of the birds is selling a car. If they market this right, it should do well with youngens such as myself.

The Chase and Gordon not winning what would've been his 5th title because of it (and lots of other issues with NASCAR) is what made me angrily abandon NASCAR as a fan. The 2004 season was the last I watched entirely, then I watched sporadically until 2007 when I left for good after their Car of Tomorrow was a slow…

Yamaha has a successful motors division, and that was spun off back in the 1950s. I guess you could compare the two, but you're going back a pretty long time, and Yamaha had like 50 years of musical instruments and audio stuff before going into motors and stuff.

Making prototypes is not mass-producing cars. Part of the difficulty in me believing Apple will straight up do a car is the turnaround time from "let's hire engineers" to "mass-produce it!" that is suggested. Even Tesla took about 10 years to go from start to Model S. Also, mass-producing a car is wildly different…

Is this that thing where he punched his mother? Or was that found to not be real?

Manufacturing cars and manufacturing iPhones are not the same. Not remotely the same.

Who said you can't make a handheld device with music on it?