Making all the road courses and street circuits on NBC Sports Network makes it hard to watch for us cord-cutters. ABC is all in on the ovals, though, and I literally couldn't care less about oval racing unless it's the Indy 500. So yeah, I'd like to watch, but I'm not paying a cable co an extra $30 a month to watch.

That word, I don't think it means what you think it means.

He looks like literally any other douchebag I've seen on the streets.

I'm not even gonna mark this against him. Yankees and Red Sox fans fondly remember Papelbon as not the sharpest rifle in the kitchen.

+1 Excellent

I've acknowledged the money thing 4 times already. Still doesn't support your argument in any way other than "something something UN something money."

Actually, no. Seeing as how you presented that article as the end-all proof that climate change is a hoax, you put that on yourself. Proceed with your logic acrobatics.

I've read the article and there's still nothing crazy or sinister in it. And it still has absolutely nothing to do with the concept of climate change itself. You're trying too hard.

The mental gymnastics you have to do to convince yourself you're in the right are amazing. That's right, it's all a big conspiracy by the UN (LOL) and vast majority of scientists to make money. ExxonMobil on the other hand are poor, powerless underdogs trying to protect us from those evil scientists. And no, I don't…

Bigotry? Really? The crazy is strong with you. Continue to fear the green helicopters, padawan.

It's an engineering issue for our subways. There are certain ultra-tight curves in the A and B divisions that make articulation impossible.

Middle-aged people use those, too. That's not even a thing anymore.

Is that race name a real thing? Please say no.

This is hilarious. You still haven't pointed out anything that has anything to do with global warming being a hoax, or anything that I didn't see in the article. You haven't even kept up with the talking points you're supposed to parrot. The republicans and oil companies now say climate change is real, just not…

That article was pretty clear about wealthy nations doing what they technically already do: help poorer ones after natural disasters. That requires money, yes. I guess I didn't look hard enough for the patterns of words buried and scrambled that tell the real truth of it all being a UN plot to tax you and take your…

Not looking down, just being realistic. Texas is gun country, and NASCAR is big in Texas and the South.

Honest question: that article helps your argument...how? I mean, how dare we like help poor countries if they get hit with a hurricane or droughts or something, right?

I think it's actually a perfect sponsor for the race considering the location and NASCAR demographic.

Holy shit the boatful of crazy in that post.

Caray and Buck are bad, but *nobody* is as downright awful as Hawk.