if you were using my computer, i would say its your imagination. 385ish with ~50 tabs open. Whichever ones happen to be open atm. Most aren't very flashy though, so.

im not really sure how that applies to anything at all. In terms of UI 4.0 can be exactly the same, but it can also do much more. So your post is silly.

afaik, if you develop an addon using the SDK on firefox, its no-restart, and just as easy to develop because afaik they both use similar javascript-like syntax. Plus you have less restrictions.

i have no idea what you're talking about with this errors business in the betas. But the final product is very stable. Has never crashed, and i haven't had any problems with it not functioning as expected.

and they do the dev version of Chrome, but only the official releases of the other browsers.

I read that as firefox users's beta. Which would mean he was saying that this was the longest firefox beta.

i personally have had literally none of your problems. Also, I dunno if it will happen soon, but it wouldn't surprise me if a bunch of people liked the new hover placement and make an addon for it. The problem for me was training myself to not look at the bottom of the screen. The change was just too great and when it…

you already can have extensions with no restart update/install. Shows how much you know. The only problem is that many a many addons use more complicated things to work than would the jetpack sdk allow them to use. Meaning they use things that wouldnt be possible in Chrome or Opera.

actually it may only be because of the way that they update. All of the changes and additions to each version seem to be rather large. Its all the small updates that they push out to people automatically, but its only the large, number changing ones that you have to choose to download so that users aren't angry when…

@dennis.g: i lol'd at that too

any site that has indie games on it

@jamio: install addon compatibilty reporter. I havent seen any addons that worked in beta 1 and dont work now. This addon will let you install/enable ones that techincally aren't updated for the current version.

@Platypus Man: you cant run anything inside anything inside anything. After you run whatever from inside whatever, it just asks you to install the plugin that you've already installed and it doesn't go any further.

@TyphoidKitten: i wasn't even referring to today. Before today it was just as prominent. I was also continuing my thought from my previous comment, but only i will understand that, so i could understand someone thinking differently.

on the other hand, lifehacker does seem to have a boner for Chrome.

@fermentingmind: there's been 2 to my knowledge? One saying that there was a new thing in beta, and a second to show the details of the service. I see more posts about twitter, and i dont see anything cool about twitter

having never used Grooveshark before, it certainly is very goodlooking, and feels very snappy.

@PrairieMoon: they're basically like svn revisions, but it larger doses.

@kondrik: auto update meaning? I will go to Minefield, help, about Minefield every other day or so, and a new one is always there. Sometimes it will pop up a little thing at the bottom saying that one is ready to apply. In any case, when that happens or maybe even when it doesnt and there is an update ready, when you…

I wouldnt say get rid of the firefox button, like someone else said, but make it a toolbar button so it can be added and removed. It would also be able to be put on the same line as the tabs, which would save space if wanted.