@SirRipo: This is awesome. But it shows one big disadvantage of Audis: the engine is too far in front of the front wheels.

9 people think this is nice? Wow...

Those Kamaz trucks are just fantastic.

@Kuro: Ok, like I already admitted, the last time I drove a Mustang was in 2007. Maybe I should give the revised version a chance.

@ZeroOrDie: Good idea... My experience is from 2006 and 2007. I really should give em a chance.

@pauljones: Nope, it was not a Fox body Mustang. I drove those rentals in 2006 and 2007.

@corporateoppressor: Where did I say I was not impressed by the handling of the Vette? I once drove a C6 and I was hugely impressed.

@ZeroOrDie: Ok, I admit that comparing the Mustang to an Exige is a bit unfair.

@ZeroOrDie: I don´t hate the Stang, like I said I even like it. I dream of owning one. I drove a Convertible as a rental car several times (I consider myself lucky for that). I enjoyed it a lot. But I was not impressed by the handling. Or the 4 speed auto slush box with electrically engaged overdrive. Or the mere 200…

This car needs some hydraulically actuated features:

@Wes Siler: No it isn´t. Don´t get me wrong here. I like the Mustang. I really do. I like it for what it is: a muscle car.

Germany´s Mustang? This would mean that the Mustang would actually be a capable sportscar.

The Ferrari Modulo. If you think that this car was created in 1970, it is just so ahead of it´s time.

First of all, I like big Alfas. Last night I even dreamed about one (no kidding). So NP

I am always a little shocked when I read something like "20 years ago" about something I remember well (if only as a scale model). I had a 1:24 scale model of this in yellow.

I kind of like the front. It is a rare car that doesn´t cost much and seems to have good ingredients. NP.

Troy Queef approves.

@SpainIsInYurp: Exactly. I also find it interesting that it was built until the 1950s, when it was replaced by the DS. What a leap in design!

Nobody mentioned the original gangsteur car?

@TroyQueef: image fail :(