I am genuinely an honest person. Doesn't mean I am nice, however.

Unpopularity is the price one must pay when standing up to the popular and their supposed "truths" they've made up as a collective.

Ha ha, this entire thing seems like a desperation article.

Trying and failing to control the narrative of lies, Kotaku?

You can't fake a threat every time something doesn't go your way. And if the threats are real, you are going to eventually get "crying wolf syndrome" from your audience eventually.

Two days, two…

Not sensetive. Just weary of the narrative manipulation going on.

Actually, they do. Didn't you hear about Milo getting a syringe in his mail?

>inb4 an entire movement is blamed instead of just the single letter writer.

Look, we all have our crazies. When the third wave femnists throw out their "Kill all men" and "Don't breasfeed baby males" crazies, you will have a place to talk from about removing the beasts from your stable.

>Blaming people.
>Not just blaming the one person who sent the letter.

Who exactly are you trying to lump in by claiming the letter writer was a "people"?

Don't you mean WTF person/man/woman? Singular?

Unless you are going to try and roll together a lot of other people into that letter?

So someone makes a sockpuppet account, harasses her, and then of course Kotaku runs wild with the article instead of talking about their own faults first.

So someone makes a sockpuppet account, harasses her, and then of course Kotaku runs wild with the article instead of talking about their own faults first.

You are absolutely wrong. Those are the types of people who we dejected also. And who you are lumping us in with.

I am the type of man who is "not" your problem, believe it or not. I am actually an example of how to be a nerd and not be an aspie/creeper. In the workplace, I receive notice from my boss that all the…

I agree. Cultural Marxists want everyone to be chained together in mutual slavery, and mentally silenced.

They won't stop until thought policing is a thing.

Third wave femnists are the spoiled brat offsrping of real femnists.

Third wavers have NO IDEA how to help other women. You ask them to figure out how to uplift women, they all disappear because it's not about "them" personally.

You ask them to hurt men? They show up in droves. Like literal droves. The chance to…

Because she has the ear of the gaming media, and they have doing a lot of agenda pushing and have a lot dirty laundry and conflicts of interests.

Gaming media (like regular media) is not to be trusted at the moment.

And their love affair with Anita and the undue exposure she gets is telling.

Silverstring media is all…

I understand you, but if you choose Anita to represent you, and you do NOT force her to be the best she can be, to represent female gamers in the best way possible, she is going to face harsh criticism and opposition.

First off, I've been playing video games since 1987.

I lived in a home with constant yelling, and fighting. Usually over money. Also because of conflict of cultures (mother was European, father was Arab Muslim. Fun mix).

So there is yelling in the house, and not a lot of structure/culture to fall back on.

Then I get…

I am not going to get a medal for being a dude playing games. I understand this. I accept this.

Why do you think people should get special snowflake status for being a woman playing games, and enable this sort of juvenile behavior?

She does a disservice by painting females like her as psychopaths who hate men, when most men are happy to have female gamers around.

What we don't like is women crucifying the things we like as male gamers. That's not going to get "more" girls into gaming. That will only infuriate the male gamers and make them become…

Wherever Anita is mentioned, she will be confronted and fought on her ideology. Even when an article shows her as a victim.

I am sorry.

It is the new reality now. There is too much at stake. Truth and reason are being suppressed for feels and cultural marxism.

Any article, no matter the content, about Anita will be…

Huh, my posts keep getting eaten.

Basically, the article is written in a way to already imply the "guilt" of anyone who post against Anita. The article is written so that anyone who is losing their argument can point and go "That's not even what the article is about! It's about how bomb threats are bad, and you just…

Nice buzzwords you got there.

And how does one over-represent the biggest demographic of paying customers, who made an industry what it is after 30 years of support? And what exactly is "wrong" with that idea?

Name three things that are legit wrong with that.