I don't see a need for apps in the car, minus a map app and music services. I'm happy with the current programmable QNX based cars. Most automakers program their own interface and GUI into them anyways. As far as I can see it, there's no need for services in the car. Just give me a charge port and an aux port.

They named it wrong for the North American version. In Japan it's called the TS trim. Essentially, body and visual fixes for TS models.

Sound like it's aiming for the Z.

For people who want to easily crack it, angle the phone to the light and look at the grease marks. It show the pattern they use. It runs one way or another.

If you company and phone supports separate work accounts that the best way. One OS side will have no distraction apps.

Blaq instead of Twitter (BB10)

For mobiles to mobiles, I generally try to use BBM but if that's not an option, Skype has the ability to go from desktop to mobile.

That's fine. Go after the bigger guns.

Underrated is the word.

apparently there's a fairly long list of differences between those SUVS. Not just fancy stuff but mechanical too. Not both of these are too richh for my blood.
just saying, Cadillac's no longer lazy.

Why don't we just go QNX as a base and a programmable and differently adapted GUI instead of having Google and Apple taking over in dash?

It'll void the warranty if you install an ad blocker.

Ahh, I've got a day job unfortunately. That way I can pay for the cars. Besides, when if the cars a main attraction and pre release, it's hard to get really close or in one. They're sometimes fenced off and on their rotative pedestal. I used to a TV station cameraman and that was one of the perks. Not many people get…

I thought it wasn't out yet. I haven't. I'll reserve my judgement until I see one in person though.

Wise advice. Only problem, next month, should I wait longer for the Mustang? And also I like the Focus ST looks way more than the Mustang.

Ugh! BRZ, Mustang EcoBoosted or ST? Agh!!! New car next month!

Funny, the exact opposite for me. I guess our setups vary. My workstation's an Intel because it performs noticeably better than a similar AMD in media creation but AMD, I've noticed has a slightly noticeable smoother gameplay. Higher FPS too. I'm running a NVIDIA card the whole time.

Sigh, I'm not a fan of Radeon at all but the AMD FX line deserves some praise. Because a lot of people think that way, there's some underrated FX processors that really do perform better real world than an Intel counterpart. Cheaper too.

I have a special place in my heart now for BOOSTang.

I heard rice krispys are even better.