The government said they crashed planes into the building so, it's ok.

So that the wealthy can finally own the entire world. It's been generations, the goal is in sight and they're tired of waiting.

Are you are excluded from seeing what you want to see how? First problem in your logic is it self depreciates your own argument. If I see only what I want to see because I am a man, then you see only what you want to see because you are a man as well, and your idea's are as inaccurate as mine.

Yes. Yes, I do. Science is men and men see what they want to see. They routinely interpret their findings according to their expectations and every scientist knows that saying "evolution" is the path to grant money while saying "Intelligent Design" (or anything other than "evolution") is the path to administrative…

Google really could get it together. They could have folded "Wave" into "Talk" and given it a much-needed upgrade but, instead, they abandoned Wave and left Talk to rot. I was using notepad but there are many alternatives, now. I'm thoroughly invested in the poorly-implemented Google Voice but they're letting that…

Very impressive.

Even a new iPad doesn't obviate an iPad. Apple is going to enjoy this dominance for at least another decade.

"Those mutations, according to Darwin’s theory, should have conferred some advantage, and that’s exactly what the researchers found"

It's not a "war on encryption," it's a war on freedom. It's a war on humanity…every last one of us is in the cross-hairs.

I understand that Darwin's theory changes according to the needs of the proponent. You assert that a creature with an abnormal eye would "die sooner" but that's a HUGE ASSUMPTION on your part and it still starts with a fully-functioning organ…within a system of fully-to-mostly functioning organs. Furthermore, I like…

Since no one gets to observe any life form spontaneously arising from non-living matter, it will always be equally impossible to definitively "prove" whether any whole organism could have formed from "numerous, slight, successive modifications" or not. Science has enjoyed the luxury of observing the final product and…

What proof is there that the mechanisms did form through numerous, successive, slight mofidications? The very notion defies all observations. Slight modifications cause total loss of functionality. In something as critical as the eye, for example, that makes the difference between survival of a species and…

"If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. " —Charles Darwin

I would cover my head in tinfoil but the NSA has already cracked it.

There is no greater danger to everyone, everywhere, than Big Br… uh, "Uncle Sam"

Absolutely terrifying.

It tells me where to look to find your face. Ye twisteth my point. I made no assertion in favor of religion. I merely uncovered the hidden motive behind the government's shoveling of infinite dollars into space with no aliens, new earth, bacteria or anything to show for it. Ok, great, we have some nice pictures…

Are you trying to assert that these incredibly expensive missions to nowhere have paid for themselves? Nothing on your list—if true—is relevant to my original point.

So, if I knew "anything" about the theoretical benefits of staring up into the sky I'd agree with you? Which one is the middle finger key? % ø ß œ Ah, that'll have to do.

I never said that God wouldn't populate another planet but the works of God are not what science is seeking. Furthermore, how did you detect "hate" and "intolerance" from anything that I said? Does drama have a new queen?