Ridiculous. A lady doctor? Don't modern laws prevent lady doctors from interacting with men out of decency? How delightfully absurd.

Edit: forget it. I didn't realize this was a personal blog that was mainpaged.

Is that all you've got?

There's something ironic about that but I'm not going to delve into exactly why, just that it's shitty and a good example of exactly why the various Gawker subs have gotten much worse over time. "ROYGBIV - where nothing is good enough and fuck you I don't care what you think, CIS-scum."

If the Oscars weren't so awful maybe we wouldn't be subject to ten thousand diatribes about how shitty the Oscars are and people who write those shitty diatribes wouldn't have jobs anymore. So, thanks Oscars.

It's still in the greys because it seems like a lot of selective approval by the author is occurring.

Fully agreed. This No True Scotsmanning of every representation of trans or queer experiences as "not good enough" has got to stop.

But she's not an icon for feminism so it's ok to hate her!

It's okay, it's wasn't uncommon historically to believe that women as a whole contributed nothing of value anywhere. I see you're just extending that assumption to your own personal set of standards as far as what it is worthwhile for a woman to contribute to the world. You're comparing two utterly indistinguishable…

Right, you'd rather he gets with a Mila Kunis type, a pretty actress, by which I assume you mean a woman who doesn't use her sexuality to make money.

When your body is being used and exploited by men, you're a whore. When you're taking advantage of the system for your own profits, you're a bitch. Yay feminism.

Are you under the mistaken impression that Dunn's crimes rise to the level of Dahmer? What he did was fucked up but I wouldn't be preening about him getting murdered in prison.

Being moved to tears is not a necessity for feeling the emotion known as "sadness". Glad I could clear that up for you.

Did you have a traumatic experience with someone swearing at you? I have a more traumatic one so yours is irrelevant.

It's not a thoughtful point. It's a victim competition.

I am reading the words you said, and I assure you I am perfectly calm. You are seriously creating a competition of emotions and declaring yourself the winner because you have the most traumatic story. So if a person who had been inside one of the towers spoke with you, by your example, you would have to shut the fuck…

Wow you have the best "claim" to 9/11? Congratulations, you're the winner of the Most Legitimate Victim award. What an insane way to look at an event. "No, you guys, you don't get to have an opinion on it because I have the best story and nobody can top it!" Really, that's just ridiculous.

That's part of the problem. Nobody's saying they experienced the same things you did, but in your zeal to be all "YOU'RE NOT A REAL VICTIM I AM A REAL VICTIM" you've glossed over that entirely. You're saying that people can't talk to you about what happened on 9/11 because they weren't as much of a victim as you are.…

No, that's pretty bullshit to be completely honest. 9/11 didn't just affect people living in New York for Christ's sake. Stop trying to exclusivize tragedies.

You certainly have a very loud and exclusionary way of rolling your eyes at people while simultaneously telling them they don't have the right to feel a response to an event they aren't connected to.