It’ll likely be in Destroy Mode for lighting effects. Unicorn just doesn’t have enough contrast to it. The problem with transforming the Unicorn is that it actually gains height and expands its joints.

So... examining the article, you either pay for permanent unlocks, or “rent” characters with in-game currency.

You know what? This looks like fun.

I once played a game with 1% the amount of drama this game has. And that’s how I retired from MMOs. The salt content in perpetual online games is too damn high for me.

Yeah, some games are horrible for this. I had one that had me jumping and forcing a perspective rotation and I couldn’t play it more than ten minutes. Others were fantastic. Rail shooters could work really well here.

Halo, Assassin’s Creed, Destiny, Call of Duty, none of these would ever have been Lego sets even if Mega Bloks didn’t exist.

Rainbow Six Siege and The Division are examples of current active Ubisoft live games. Their season passes are true seasons spanning a year. Year 2 just started for Siege, so another $30 to get new content (mostly early access and skins, you can still get without them) Imagine how World of Warcraft does expansions…

Good.

Dust3 confirmed

When I was super young, I apparently put a piece of paper into the 5.25" floppy drive of my dad’s computer. I assume it’s because I watched him put a floppy into it and equated it as an intake of paper and other things. So I assume when you understand the basics of insertion of media but not what media is, this…

I believe they also mentioned DZ7 through DZ9 would be unlocked for the vanilla Dark Zone and that would not be linked to the DLC. If they’re each the size of current DZs that’s an increase in DZ area by 50%.

No don’t show people the back pocket. Sitting gate all over again.

I actually wrote my thesis on Information Security. I’m less of a cyber security expert than my father is, as I decided to do software development over penetration defense, but I know that if you don’t invest in protection on your first day, your costs incurred from eventually securing it skyrocket, even more so when…

I’d rather have my account info protected by a $100,000 cybersecurity plan than have my account details leaked. ESEA deserves blame for not protecting the data.

I would prefer that companies spend more to improve their cybersecurity. The victim here isn’t ESEA so much as it is ESEA’s users.

You’re right. They should invest $100K in protecting their data by hiring a penetration testing company and an information assurance officer.

I failed to properly imply that they could have invested $100K in securing their data instead of having this happen. The customers got shafted the most in this situation, since their stuff is right out there in the wild.

The point which I apparently failed to make because I was in a rush was that they could have paid $100K to white hats to either secure their database or do penetration tests. Good on ESEA for not paying black hats. Bad on ESEA for not paying white hats.