Hey scumfuck racist, thanks for dropping by: do you “realice” it also means wine bar too? And lots more? Hmm wonder why you went with “cellar” then. Awesome too that in all your capitalization errors you missed the only proper noun. Go read a book.

Well let’s see I’ve lived in downtown SF for 12+ years so...here’s some of the reasons rents are high:

You seem to suggest that capitalists are, by definition, inhumane, uncaring, etc. That isn’t any more true of capitalists than socialists, communists, etc.

I hope people understand that easily 90% of this is trolling to get you worked up.

Well, sure, but that’s not a solution to the problem. It’s just where you put things. And putting things somewhere and putting things in a functioning place are very different tasks.

Me telling you you’re wrong and stupid isn’t making me weak, it’s pointing out that you’re wrong and stupid. You don’t have to personally understand something for it to very much be true. The end.

I simply don’t agree that this is an offensive name.

It’s a simple mathematical exercise: among all living humans, where do you rank Kaepernick as an NFL QB. 20th? Certainly top-30, or you’re just lying. So let’s go with 30. He’s the 30th best QB alive today.

That definition of “neoliberal” is the definition of a “conservative” and of a “libertarian.” It’s Rand Paul and DeVos and Paul Ryan, not anyone on the left that I can think of. I’d love to hear an example, but if West thinks for a second Coates shares the economic and role-of-government goals of those kinds of…

I disagree entirely. Because you increase population density, you have to then account for myriad infrastructure issues that are always ignored: traffic, sewage, food, schools. They make streets and public spaces dark, dirty, and windy. Big buildings generally mean a poor quality of life. I’ve lived in SF for 12…

Any form of government that empowers people to generate their own wealth without taxing the crap out of them affords people the opportunity to build their own wealth.

There’s a crazy weird move from young-ish journalists (all over this site, Matty Iglesias, etc.) that cities need to just build, build, build, up, up, and up. They think it will solve most economic issues. They don’t appear to have any experience with the issue beyond “well I moved from the suburbs to the city 18…

Even so, it’s the perfect name for this service, even if it may be a dumb idea.

Why, it’s almost like you can care about the well-being of people that are worse off than you. It’s almost like some people don’t have to be materially affected by a bad thing to recognize it’s bad. It’s almost like some of us aren’t assholes, asshole.

Your answer indicates that you’re ok with money influencing politicians as long as it aligns with your personal beliefs and values.

Badada-dada-dada-da-da-da

As stupid as this question is, the easy answer is this: the Koch brothers are actively making the world worse for people that don’t have things and stuff and money. Soros is not.

In these screeds HamNo typically goes out of his way to remind us just how shallow his perspective is, and how much he lacks depth of knowledge and general wisdom, opting instead for a rant that couldn’t ever actually happen for myriad reasons. But this one takes the cake: he actually linked to a specific list of…

11. Kaepernick hired the next damn day. Sorry, Garret Gilbert (their actual 3rd QB, who was drafted in 2014 and has never taken an NFL snap) but Puffy just blew it out so it’s a meritocracy again.

“...and he did it because of how he cares about minorities and their causes...”