@mittelwerk1: I had a 91 SHO for 10 years and the engine was pretty much bulletproof. Now the body hardware? That's another story. Anyways, since the article requires the vehicle to have been sold 25+ years ago, the SHO won't qualify until 2014.
@mittelwerk1: I had a 91 SHO for 10 years and the engine was pretty much bulletproof. Now the body hardware? That's another story. Anyways, since the article requires the vehicle to have been sold 25+ years ago, the SHO won't qualify until 2014.
@mingoesbueno: Yeah I gave him a few buck and also gave him the following tip: "in this car, you turn the key and THEN push the start button"
@BrtStlnd: I thought it was Lamborghini's new edition of the Gallardo
@passingas: GREAT read.
So Ohio is not only the birthplace of aviation but also its graveyard?
@NickyL: So I guess you've never met anybody that owned one of these?
@thefirebuilds: Nice try, but must be over 25 years old.
Wow the posts so far seem to confuse patents, trademarks and copyrights. Unlike a patent, one does not have to be the original creator of a design to trademark it. Nevertheless, it is totally inappropriate for Shelby to trademark this. For example, let's say that McDonald's, original seller of the Big Mac, allowed…
@failure_to_communicate: It's very weird. Also, you will turn on your wipers every time you want to signal your lane change.
@Tiberiuswise: Sorry but owners of the legendary Shelby GT350 would disagree with you that the 289 is forgotten engine.