CassiopeiaSD
CassiopeiaSD
CassiopeiaSD

I went back to school for CS, and my boyfriend (who has some experience in the industry) tells me things like “when you graduate, you should come work for this company! It’s the only place I’ve worked where half the developers are women and none of the men seem like assholes!”

On a barely-related note, the drawing of Trump in the header is the least horrific he’s ever looked. I can’t tell if I’m impressed or disappointed.

No, if anything it’s less black and white. You’re implying that there’s something sinister or deviant about any sexual desires relating to children’s entertainment, and frankly that’s judgmental and absurd. The human mind is strange and unpredictable and it is not uncommon to take any not-explicitly-sexual genre, like

Everything popular gets rule-34-ed immediately, and while I’m sure there will be TONS of erotic fanart, I doubt anyone not interested will stumble across it. There’s been Rapunzel/Flynn porn since the first trailer where he’s literally tied up with her hair, and no one who noticed it cared and no one who’d be bothered

That’s not how the insanity defense works. It’s not about her morals. For the insanity defense to succeed, her lawyers must prove ... that she failed to know right from wrong;

No, it doesn’t. The fact that she knew his family would hate her only shows that she knew there would be social consequences, the fact that she tried to delete their conversations only proves that she knew it was illegal. None of that proves that she understood what she was doing to be wrong. Understanding

Honestly I have no idea, I’d guess it depends on local laws and/or the judge’s discretion.

I agree, though honestly I don’t think there’s a serious possibility of that not happening. Either she’s found guilty, in which case she has mandatory psychological counseling in prison, mandatory counseling after her term is served if necessary, and a criminal record (which, while potentially deserved, is not going

Bernie Sanders: Supports vaccine research

Many people are saying “she knew it was illegal, therefore she knew it was wrong, therefore the insanity defense cannot apply.” I’m just trying to point out that this logic doesn’t follow: understanding what is legal does not mean you understand right and wrong.

No, because as absurd as it is that we’re still taking him seriously, him being the republican nominee increases the likelyhood of the democrat getting elected. He’s ridiculous, but I’m not sure Rubio or Cruz are much better. I mean, they do seem to understand basic facts better and I guess we know what they actually

Thank you.

Just so we’re all clear: Knowing the consequences of your actions is not the same as knowing that your actions are wrong. I’m willing to bet we all have something that we know we’d be punished for but that we don’t think is morally wrong. Personally, I speed and watch pirated content and drink while fertile. Almost

If you’re worried the police are going to come after you, then obviously your actions were bad and you are aware that they were bad.

“The real reason is they enjoy it and feel guilty about it.”

My favorite thing about Clue is that it’s the only woman-specific app I know of where everything is not pink.

Others drink lattes, eat a ham sandwich, sleep on their backs, or have a glass of wine.

Just out of curiosity, why don’t you believe people who say they read recaps of a show after they’ve stopped following it? I do this all the time, usually more because a show’s getting tedious than because it offended me, but still. Reading recaps takes less time (and, depending on the show, is less painful) and still

Well, since they’re doing everything else together, why not fuck the goat together?

Not to get all serious on a silly would-you-rather, but the reason to not fuck animals isn’t just that it’s gross, it’s that it’s rape. Animals can’t consent. At best, it’s coercion.