CassiopeiaSD
CassiopeiaSD
CassiopeiaSD

People keep bringing up the red wine thing, it makes me wonder if I drink too much. Personally, I come from a family where we have wine with pretty much every important discussion, so that’s how it sounded to me. But maybe it is a cry for help, idk. That’s not the vibe I got from it.

I’m not trying to say it isn’t a big deal, but how big a deal it is shouldn’t matter if everyone involved talked about it and decided to go ahead with it. Even if the genders were reversed, if they talk it through and respect each other and decide to have an open relationship, that’s fine.

To be fair, one would expect more lying among couples getting divorced than couples generally. Obviously I don’t know the details, but he doesn’t indicate that she’s being deceptive, and to me it seems like a funny thing to try and hide if you’re suggesting an open relationship, like hiding a molehill while pointing

If her partner’s not ok with it, she’s an asshole. But that’s not the case here. People change, and relationships change, and as long as they communicate and respect each other there’s nothing wrong with that. Dan Savage and his husband changed from monogamous to monogamish after they were already married, and he’s

See that’s just it, why do we think that? Maybe I’m missing something obvious, but he never says anything to indicate that she’s not being trustworthy. What is so unbelievable about a married woman kissing another man, realizing she has difficulty with monogamy, and talking to her husband about that? And if that is

What is his reason for wanting to branch out? The whole tone of the article leaves me feeling like he is trying this on because it makes his wife happy, not so much because it makes them both happy.

... Am I the only one getting uncomfortable at all the hate for his wife in the comments? Everyone seems to think it much more likely that she’s “manipulating” him, rather than simply having issues with the relationship as it was and discussing that with her partner. She’s being called a cheater, even though it seems

So, cheating is always wrong, but that doesn’t make publishing this information on a massive scale OK. 1: There are single people and monogamish people using this site without deceiving or breaking their word, 2: not everyone who cheats is the scum of the Earth, humans are fallible and it’s easy to poke holes in our

True, but why didn’t Janet have that kind of champion? Wasp isn’t any harder a sell than Ant-Man, and there seems to be a strong consensus that Janet Van Dyne is an extremely important part of the team in the comics.

Eh, I don’t buy that, because they’ve made so many changes that I don’t think making Hank Pym not abusive would be a stretch. They made Ultron the project of Tony and Bruce, they made Tony’s dad into one of Steve’s best friends and one of the founders of SHIELD, they made Steve’s 40’s girlfriend a brilliant spy and

I read that as more of a pre-empt to assholes. Anytime there’s a serious discussion about gaming and triggering and rape, there are assholes waiting to attack or discredit the victim. The first couple paragraphs, it seems to me, are meant to prevent that.

It’s not necessarily a red flag if a couple disagrees (it can cause relationship issues, but it isn’t abuse). However, if he’s limiting her contact with friends and family, that’s isolation and textbook abusive relationship.

You EXPECT people going on a bullshit dating show ,not on The Playboy Channel, to fuck?

...I have no idea how to respond to this. I’ve never seen abstracts from published science compared to buzzfeed before.

I don’t think it’s reaching. Not all oils can safely be used as a sexual lubricant, since that skin is abnormally sensitive, and it’s the only oil that’s proven to combat yeast infections (which can often be caused by penetrative heterosexual sex).

I was reading through this like “What? How can this have happened this is ridiculous why on earth... oh she’s black. That’s why. Because racism.”

From a quick search, this is the first I found that addresses weight, this one addresses it’s use as a skin treatment, and I posted one below on it’s use to treat yeast infections. There are more of all of these, but I’m not in the mood to sift through the adverts. There are also several studies on it’s impact on

Why does suggesting it as a sexual lubricant detract from credibility? There aren’t any studies on that specific function (that I know of), but that usage probably started because coconut oil is proven to treat yeast infections.

You’re Dr. Batman, and you want a different name for porn?

Thank you! I was afraid no one here had seen “10 Things I Hate About You,” it was confusing.